DOJ-OGR-00007871.json 3.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "499-2",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 3 of 159 2\nLBAAMAX1ps\n1 (Case called)\n2 THE CLERK: Counsel, please state your name for the\n3 record, starting with the government.\n4 MS. POMERANTZ: Good morning, your Honor. Lara\n5 Pomerantz, Andrew Rohrbach, Alison Moe, and Maureen Comey for\n6 the government.\n7 THE COURT: Good morning.\n8 For the defendant.\n9 MS. STERNHEIM: Good morning, Judge. Bobbi C.\n10 Sternheim appearing with Ghislaine Maxwell at counsel table,\n11 along with Jeffery Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian\n12 Everdell. And we're assisted by Camille Delgado.\n13 THE COURT: Good morning, everyone. Thank you.\n14 Please be seated.\n15 All right. We are here for a number of things. Let\n16 me just get myself organized.\n17 This is a pretrial conference. Our jury selection\n18 process began on November 4th with the questionnaires, trial to\n19 commence on November 29th.\n20 Today, we will address the defendant's motion under\n21 Federal Rule of Evidence 412, the defendant's motion in limine\n22 to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert, and\n23 the other outstanding issues that overlap with these motions,\n24 as we discussed at our last conference on November 1st.\n25 Just for clarity, I explained this in my order\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007871",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 3 of 159 2",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LBAAMAX1ps",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "(Case called)\nTHE CLERK: Counsel, please state your name for the\nrecord, starting with the government.\nMS. POMERANTZ: Good morning, your Honor. Lara\nPomerantz, Andrew Rohrbach, Alison Moe, and Maureen Comey for\nthe government.\nTHE COURT: Good morning.\nFor the defendant.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Good morning, Judge. Bobbi C.\nSternheim appearing with Ghislaine Maxwell at counsel table,\nalong with Jeffery Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian\nEverdell. And we're assisted by Camille Delgado.\nTHE COURT: Good morning, everyone. Thank you.\nPlease be seated.\nAll right. We are here for a number of things. Let\nme just get myself organized.\nThis is a pretrial conference. Our jury selection\nprocess began on November 4th with the questionnaires, trial to\ncommence on November 29th.\nToday, we will address the defendant's motion under\nFederal Rule of Evidence 412, the defendant's motion in limine\nto exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert, and\nthe other outstanding issues that overlap with these motions,\nas we discussed at our last conference on November 1st.\nJust for clarity, I explained this in my order",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007871",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Lara Pomerantz",
  41. "Andrew Rohrbach",
  42. "Alison Moe",
  43. "Maureen Comey",
  44. "Bobbi C. Sternheim",
  45. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  46. "Jeffery Pagliuca",
  47. "Laura Menninger",
  48. "Christian Everdell",
  49. "Camille Delgado"
  50. ],
  51. "organizations": [
  52. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  53. ],
  54. "locations": [],
  55. "dates": [
  56. "November 4th",
  57. "November 29th",
  58. "November 1st",
  59. "11/23/21"
  60. ],
  61. "reference_numbers": [
  62. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  63. "499-2",
  64. "DOJ-OGR-00007871"
  65. ]
  66. },
  67. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  68. }