mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007910.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "42",
    "document_number": "499-2",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 42 of 159\nLBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct\n1 been convicted and who admit to their crimes, asking them what\n2 sorts of techniques they utilized in order to perpetuate the\n3 sexual abuse. There have been studies that have been done with\n4 victims, in terms of asking them what sorts of experiences they\n5 had. There have also been studies that have been conducted\n6 with professionals in various fields; law and human services\n7 and psychology about the types of tactics and strategies that\n8 have been used.\n9 Q. How do the results of those studies compare?\n10 A. There's remarkable consistency. And even though\n11 definitions may vary in studies, as they always do, there are\n12 common -- a clear set of common strategies, techniques and\n13 behaviors that have been identified in the literature across\n14 time and across various samples.\n15 Q. When you review articles about grooming, what sorts of\n16 things are you looking for to determine the quality of articles\n17 you are relying on?\n18 A. I'm looking at whether or not it's in a peer review\n19 journal. I'm looking at how a particular study was conducted.\n20 So for example, if they're doing content analysis of an\n21 interview, are they making sure that ways that that interview\n22 has been coded by multiple individuals to get some sort of\n23 consistency there. I'm looking at how they chose the sample\n24 size. I'm looking at if it's a review that summarizes the\n25 state of the literature, is the literature review\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007910",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 42 of 159",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 been convicted and who admit to their crimes, asking them what\n2 sorts of techniques they utilized in order to perpetuate the\n3 sexual abuse. There have been studies that have been done with\n4 victims, in terms of asking them what sorts of experiences they\n5 had. There have also been studies that have been conducted\n6 with professionals in various fields; law and human services\n7 and psychology about the types of tactics and strategies that\n8 have been used.\n9 Q. How do the results of those studies compare?\n10 A. There's remarkable consistency. And even though\n11 definitions may vary in studies, as they always do, there are\n12 common -- a clear set of common strategies, techniques and\n13 behaviors that have been identified in the literature across\n14 time and across various samples.\n15 Q. When you review articles about grooming, what sorts of\n16 things are you looking for to determine the quality of articles\n17 you are relying on?\n18 A. I'm looking at whether or not it's in a peer review\n19 journal. I'm looking at how a particular study was conducted.\n20 So for example, if they're doing content analysis of an\n21 interview, are they making sure that ways that that interview\n22 has been coded by multiple individuals to get some sort of\n23 consistency there. I'm looking at how they chose the sample\n24 size. I'm looking at if it's a review that summarizes the\n25 state of the literature, is the literature review",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007910",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/23/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-2",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007910"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}