DOJ-OGR-00007915.json 4.0 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "47",
  4. "document_number": "499-2",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 47 of 159 46 LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct\n1 Q. Does this article use any particular sampling?\n2 A. The sampling was of professionals from a variety of fields.\n3 And it looked for content analysis and commonalities in what\n4 these professionals reported were common behaviors and tactics\n5 that were used across types of victimization.\n6 Q. How, if at all, does that impact your assessment of the\n7 study and article?\n8 A. It impacts it significantly. Because what this article is\n9 doing is not only is it replicating what has previously been\n10 found about tactics that are used, it's extending that\n11 literature and saying that these are common patterns of\n12 behavior that are used in the service of coercive control in a\n13 variety of types of victimization. So it's identifying a\n14 common tactic that's used in a number of settings to gain and\n15 maintain power and to coerce a victim into some form of\n16 behavior.\n17 THE COURT: Let me ask on that, one of the examples\n18 you gave was the pimp and sex worker relationship. In some of\n19 the literature and in the cases, trauma bonding is the phrase\n20 that's used?\n21 THE WITNESS: Yes.\n22 THE COURT: What's your understanding of the\n23 similarity, the overlap and prevalence of understanding of\n24 these two concepts in the field?\n25 THE WITNESS: In the field, there's significant -- so\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007915",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 47 of 159 46 LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 Q. Does this article use any particular sampling?\n2 A. The sampling was of professionals from a variety of fields.\n3 And it looked for content analysis and commonalities in what\n4 these professionals reported were common behaviors and tactics\n5 that were used across types of victimization.\n6 Q. How, if at all, does that impact your assessment of the\n7 study and article?\n8 A. It impacts it significantly. Because what this article is\n9 doing is not only is it replicating what has previously been\n10 found about tactics that are used, it's extending that\n11 literature and saying that these are common patterns of\n12 behavior that are used in the service of coercive control in a\n13 variety of types of victimization. So it's identifying a\n14 common tactic that's used in a number of settings to gain and\n15 maintain power and to coerce a victim into some form of\n16 behavior.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "17 THE COURT: Let me ask on that, one of the examples\n18 you gave was the pimp and sex worker relationship. In some of\n19 the literature and in the cases, trauma bonding is the phrase\n20 that's used?\n21 THE WITNESS: Yes.\n22 THE COURT: What's your understanding of the\n23 similarity, the overlap and prevalence of understanding of\n24 these two concepts in the field?\n25 THE WITNESS: In the field, there's significant -- so",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007915",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [],
  40. "organizations": [
  41. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [],
  44. "dates": [
  45. "11/23/21"
  46. ],
  47. "reference_numbers": [
  48. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  49. "499-2",
  50. "DOJ-OGR-00007915"
  51. ]
  52. },
  53. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  54. }