mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007920.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "52",
    "document_number": "499-2",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 52 of 159\n\nLBAGmax2\nRocchio - Direct\n1 show Dr. Rocchio Exhibit 4.\n2 BY MS. POMERANTZ:\n3 Q. Do you recognize this?\n4 A. I do.\n5 Q. What is it?\n6 A. It's an article on the construct of grooming in child sexual abuse that identifies both a summary of literature as well as some of the conceptual and measurement issues that were present at the time the article was written.\n7\n8\n9\n10 Q. Who wrote this article?\n11 A. Natalie Bennett and William O'Donohue.\n12 MS. POMERANTZ: The government offers Exhibit 4.\n13\n14 MR. PAGLIUCA: No objection.\n15 THE COURT: Thank you. Government Exhibit 4 is admitted into the hearing record.\n16 (Government's Exhibit 4 received in evidence)\n17 BY MS. POMERANTZ:\n18 Q. Is this one of the articles that you provided the government?\n19 A. It is.\n20\n21 Q. Why did you provide the government with this article?\n22 A. I think that this article does a really good job of summarizing much of the previous literature that has been published and peer-reviewed sources about the grooming process. It identified some of the issues and varying definitions. It\n23\n24\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 52 of 159",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAGmax2\nRocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 show Dr. Rocchio Exhibit 4.\n2 BY MS. POMERANTZ:\n3 Q. Do you recognize this?\n4 A. I do.\n5 Q. What is it?\n6 A. It's an article on the construct of grooming in child sexual abuse that identifies both a summary of literature as well as some of the conceptual and measurement issues that were present at the time the article was written.\n7\n8\n9\n10 Q. Who wrote this article?\n11 A. Natalie Bennett and William O'Donohue.\n12 MS. POMERANTZ: The government offers Exhibit 4.\n13\n14 MR. PAGLIUCA: No objection.\n15 THE COURT: Thank you. Government Exhibit 4 is admitted into the hearing record.\n16 (Government's Exhibit 4 received in evidence)\n17 BY MS. POMERANTZ:\n18 Q. Is this one of the articles that you provided the government?\n19 A. It is.\n20\n21 Q. Why did you provide the government with this article?\n22 A. I think that this article does a really good job of summarizing much of the previous literature that has been published and peer-reviewed sources about the grooming process. It identified some of the issues and varying definitions. It",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Dr. Rocchio",
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "Natalie Bennett",
      "William O'Donohue",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/23/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-2"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}