| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "56",
- "document_number": "499-2",
- "date": "11/23/21",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 56 of 15955\nLBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct\n1 of how it affects an individual. So if we know that it's a\n2 relationship of trust, for example, that typically results in\n3 feelings of shame on the part of the victim, obviously, we had\n4 to study how that trust was built up and how that relationship\n5 developed over time. That's well established. And there's\n6 consensus that that is a significant part of the dynamics of\n7 child sexual abuse.\n8 Q. I want to turn to the next two sentences starting with \"The\n9 field possesses\" and going through \"does not meet some of the\n10 criteria in the Daubert standard.\"\n11 A. Okay.\n12 Q. Do you see that, Dr. Rocchio?\n13 A. Mm-hmm.\n14 Q. What is your reaction to the statement that grooming is not\n15 a construct that ought to be used in forensic settings?\n16 A. As I indicated, I think that it is absolutely part and\n17 parcel of a forensic evaluation to look at what are the\n18 behaviors, what is their impact and what was their function.\n19 So I think that to the extent that we have the ability in a\n20 forensic setting, in particular, to look for corroboration, to\n21 look for consistency among different data points, between what\n22 you are being told by an individual, between what other people\n23 have observed, for example, what people are reporting on\n24 measures and tests, what individuals have told in a\n25 contemporaneous setting. I think there are a lot of ways you\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007924",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 56 of 15955",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 of how it affects an individual. So if we know that it's a\n2 relationship of trust, for example, that typically results in\n3 feelings of shame on the part of the victim, obviously, we had\n4 to study how that trust was built up and how that relationship\n5 developed over time. That's well established. And there's\n6 consensus that that is a significant part of the dynamics of\n7 child sexual abuse.\n8 Q. I want to turn to the next two sentences starting with \"The\n9 field possesses\" and going through \"does not meet some of the\n10 criteria in the Daubert standard.\"\n11 A. Okay.\n12 Q. Do you see that, Dr. Rocchio?\n13 A. Mm-hmm.\n14 Q. What is your reaction to the statement that grooming is not\n15 a construct that ought to be used in forensic settings?\n16 A. As I indicated, I think that it is absolutely part and\n17 parcel of a forensic evaluation to look at what are the\n18 behaviors, what is their impact and what was their function.\n19 So I think that to the extent that we have the ability in a\n20 forensic setting, in particular, to look for corroboration, to\n21 look for consistency among different data points, between what\n22 you are being told by an individual, between what other people\n23 have observed, for example, what people are reporting on\n24 measures and tests, what individuals have told in a\n25 contemporaneous setting. I think there are a lot of ways you",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007924",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Dr. Rocchio"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "11/23/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "499-2",
- "DOJ-OGR-00007924"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|