mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007939.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "71",
    "document_number": "499-2",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 71 of 159 70\nLBAAMAX3ps\nRocchio - Direct\n1 literature compare to your clinical practice and your forensic practice with respect to the question of individuals with\n2 particular vulnerabilities being at higher risk of childhood sexual abuse?\n3\n4\n5 A. It's highly consistent.\n6 Q. The defense has argued that a victim's prior sexual behavior is relevant to the concept of grooming. What's your\n7 reaction to that?\n8\n9 A. In what way? I mean, I've talked about, certainly their experiences of victimization can make them more vulnerable, but\n10 I'm not sure what you mean.\n11\n12 Q. Does whether a person, whether or not a person has had sexual experience, putting aside prior victimization, make them\n13 more or less vulnerable to being groomed?\n14\n15 A. I'm not aware of any literature on that issue, nor do I even understand how that would theoretically make sense. To\n16 the extent that you're suggesting that somebody who has been sexually active in the past can or cannot be groomed, I'm not,\n17 even theoretically, I don't understand why that would be the case.\n18\n19 But, no, certainly I don't believe that there is any literature that would support that statement.\n20\n21\n22\n23 THE COURT: So to the extent you've seen in your practice and studies the impact of prior sexual conduct on the\n24 phenomenon of grooming, you understand it to potentially\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007939",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 71 of 159 70",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAAMAX3ps\nRocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 literature compare to your clinical practice and your forensic practice with respect to the question of individuals with\n2 particular vulnerabilities being at higher risk of childhood sexual abuse?\n3\n4\n5 A. It's highly consistent.\n6 Q. The defense has argued that a victim's prior sexual behavior is relevant to the concept of grooming. What's your\n7 reaction to that?\n8\n9 A. In what way? I mean, I've talked about, certainly their experiences of victimization can make them more vulnerable, but\n10 I'm not sure what you mean.\n11\n12 Q. Does whether a person, whether or not a person has had sexual experience, putting aside prior victimization, make them\n13 more or less vulnerable to being groomed?\n14\n15 A. I'm not aware of any literature on that issue, nor do I even understand how that would theoretically make sense. To\n16 the extent that you're suggesting that somebody who has been sexually active in the past can or cannot be groomed, I'm not,\n17 even theoretically, I don't understand why that would be the case.\n18\n19 But, no, certainly I don't believe that there is any literature that would support that statement.\n20\n21\n22\n23 THE COURT: So to the extent you've seen in your practice and studies the impact of prior sexual conduct on the\n24 phenomenon of grooming, you understand it to potentially\n25",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007939",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/23/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-2",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007939"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content discusses a legal case involving childhood sexual abuse and the concept of grooming."
}