mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008008.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "140",
    "document_number": "499-2",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 140 of 159\nLBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross\n1 which is this article. If I may approach your clerk and give\n2 your clerk some copies.\n3 THE COURT: That's fine.\n4 MS. POMERANTZ: May I have a copy?\n5 THE COURT: The government needs a copy.\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, I've got copies for everybody.\n7 THE CLERK: Do you have another copy? Do you have an\n8 extra copy for us?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do.\n10 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:\n11 Q. This is, as you identified, the Craven article, correct?\n12 A. It is.\n13 Q. And in the introduction, Ms. Craven says that this\n14 phenomenon of grooming is little -- \"there is little\n15 understanding about this phenomenon\" correct?\n16 A. Where are you reading from? I'm sorry.\n17 Q. Introduction, middle of the page. Fourth line down.\n18 A. \"About this phenomenon.\" Yes.\n19 Q. And that's the ultimate conclusion of this article,\n20 understanding that it was written in 2006. Right?\n21 A. And whether it was the ultimate conclusion, that is\n22 something that they posit in the introduction, yes.\n23 Q. May we go to page 11, to the conclusion. \"Despite the wide\n24 acceptance of the term, sexual grooming of children is not\n25 understood clearly, particularly in the public domain.\" Do you\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 140 of 159",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 which is this article. If I may approach your clerk and give\n2 your clerk some copies.\n3 THE COURT: That's fine.\n4 MS. POMERANTZ: May I have a copy?\n5 THE COURT: The government needs a copy.\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, I've got copies for everybody.\n7 THE CLERK: Do you have another copy? Do you have an\n8 extra copy for us?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do.\n10 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:\n11 Q. This is, as you identified, the Craven article, correct?\n12 A. It is.\n13 Q. And in the introduction, Ms. Craven says that this\n14 phenomenon of grooming is little -- \"there is little\n15 understanding about this phenomenon\" correct?\n16 A. Where are you reading from? I'm sorry.\n17 Q. Introduction, middle of the page. Fourth line down.\n18 A. \"About this phenomenon.\" Yes.\n19 Q. And that's the ultimate conclusion of this article,\n20 understanding that it was written in 2006. Right?\n21 A. And whether it was the ultimate conclusion, that is\n22 something that they posit in the introduction, yes.\n23 Q. May we go to page 11, to the conclusion. \"Despite the wide\n24 acceptance of the term, sexual grooming of children is not\n25 understood clearly, particularly in the public domain.\" Do you",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Pomerantz",
      "Pagliuca",
      "Craven"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/23/21",
      "2006"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-2"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}