mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008022.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "154",
    "document_number": "499-2",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 154 of 159\nLBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross\n1 THE COURT: And I would suggest that the microphone point directly at you.\n2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.\n3 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n4 A. So the significance of delayed disclosure as it relates to\n5 my opinion is, it is part of our understanding of phenomenology\n6 of child sexual abuse and the ways in which individuals tell.\n7 So I'm not identifying delayed disclosure as a predictor. I'm\n8 simply saying that it is a common phenomenon that is observed\n9 in the scientific literature to occur among children who are\n10 sexually abused.\n11 Q. Well, there are many other reasons why these reports may\n12 surface not immediately. Correct?\n13 A. Again, I'm commenting at this point my opinion is that\n14 delayed disclosure is common. I'm not -- do you have a\n15 question about the reasons why?\n16 Q. Yeah. There are many reasons why. There are allegations\n17 that are made months, weeks, years, after an alleged event.\n18 Correct?\n19 A. Correct.\n20 Q. And they may or may not have anything to do with the\n21 veracity of the allegation. Correct?\n22 A. The reasons may not have -- again, are you -- I mean, are\n23 you asking me, can people make false claims?\n24 Q. Yes.\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00008022",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 154 of 159",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: And I would suggest that the microphone point directly at you.\n2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.\n3 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n4 A. So the significance of delayed disclosure as it relates to\n5 my opinion is, it is part of our understanding of phenomenology\n6 of child sexual abuse and the ways in which individuals tell.\n7 So I'm not identifying delayed disclosure as a predictor. I'm\n8 simply saying that it is a common phenomenon that is observed\n9 in the scientific literature to occur among children who are\n10 sexually abused.\n11 Q. Well, there are many other reasons why these reports may\n12 surface not immediately. Correct?\n13 A. Again, I'm commenting at this point my opinion is that\n14 delayed disclosure is common. I'm not -- do you have a\n15 question about the reasons why?\n16 Q. Yeah. There are many reasons why. There are allegations\n17 that are made months, weeks, years, after an alleged event.\n18 Correct?\n19 A. Correct.\n20 Q. And they may or may not have anything to do with the\n21 veracity of the allegation. Correct?\n22 A. The reasons may not have -- again, are you -- I mean, are\n23 you asking me, can people make false claims?\n24 Q. Yes.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008022",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/23/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-2",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008022"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}