DOJ-OGR-00008025.json 3.6 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "157",
  4. "document_number": "499-2",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 157 of 159156 LBAAMAX5ps\n1 identified, because we can't randomly assign individuals to be\n2 sexually abused or not. So we have to look at other measures\n3 of testability and scientific ways to study these issues, as\n4 well as acceptance within the commun -- general and\n5 professional community.\n6 Q. And finally, what is the study that you're relying on to\n7 determine that this theory of grooming has gained general\n8 acceptance in the scientific community?\n9 A. As I've said, none of my opinions are based on any single\n10 study, alone.\n11 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's all I have, your Honor. Thank\n12 you.\n13 THE COURT: OK. Thank you.\n14 Anything, Ms. Pomerantz?\n15 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, may we have a moment?\n16 THE COURT: You may.\n17 (Counsel confer)\n18 MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing from the government, your\n19 Honor.\n20 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n21 Dr. Rocchio, thank you very much. You're excused.\n22 THE WITNESS: Thank you, your Honor.\n23 (Witness excused)\n24 THE COURT: I just, I have a couple of questions for\n25 the defense. Does the defense intend to impeach witness\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00008025",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 157 of 159156 LBAAMAX5ps",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 identified, because we can't randomly assign individuals to be\n2 sexually abused or not. So we have to look at other measures\n3 of testability and scientific ways to study these issues, as\n4 well as acceptance within the commun -- general and\n5 professional community.\n6 Q. And finally, what is the study that you're relying on to\n7 determine that this theory of grooming has gained general\n8 acceptance in the scientific community?\n9 A. As I've said, none of my opinions are based on any single\n10 study, alone.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "11 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's all I have, your Honor. Thank\n12 you.\n13 THE COURT: OK. Thank you.\n14 Anything, Ms. Pomerantz?\n15 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, may we have a moment?\n16 THE COURT: You may.\n17 (Counsel confer)\n18 MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing from the government, your\n19 Honor.\n20 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "21 Dr. Rocchio, thank you very much. You're excused.\n22 THE WITNESS: Thank you, your Honor.\n23 (Witness excused)\n24 THE COURT: I just, I have a couple of questions for\n25 the defense. Does the defense intend to impeach witness",
  30. "position": "main"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008025",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [
  45. "MR. PAGLIUCA",
  46. "MS. POMERANTZ",
  47. "Dr. Rocchio"
  48. ],
  49. "organizations": [
  50. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  51. ],
  52. "locations": [],
  53. "dates": [
  54. "11/23/21"
  55. ],
  56. "reference_numbers": [
  57. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  58. "499-2",
  59. "DOJ-OGR-00008025"
  60. ]
  61. },
  62. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  63. }