DOJ-OGR-00008047.json 4.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "6 of 28",
  4. "document_number": "507",
  5. "date": "11/24/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 507 Filed 11/24/21 Page 6 of 28\nCourt \"must consider whether an expert's proposed testimony would usurp the province of the judge to instruct on the law, or of the jury to make factual determinations.\" Island Intell. Prop. LLC v. Deutsche Bank AG, No. 09 Civ. 2675 (KBF), 2012 WL 526722, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2012) (citations omitted).\nII. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DR. RYAN HALL\nDr. Ryan Hall is a psychiatrist who frequently testifies as an expert witness.\nAccording to the notice provided by the defendant, Dr. Hall \"will offer the opinions and diagnoses contained in his report, the bases for those opinions, and the significance of the diagnoses and opinions.\" (Ex. A, Def. Expert Notice, at 12).2\nThis Court should exclude Dr. Hall's testimony. As disclosed, his expert opinions have no relevance, because none bears on the facts of this case or Minor Victim-4's credibility. Any basis for those opinions is therefore also irrelevant. Similarly, absent some as-yet-undisclosed relevance, the \"significance\" of Dr. Hall's opinions have no bearing here: Because none of those opinions bear on the facts of this case or a witness's credibility, their introduction would serve only Dr. Hall's proffered fact testimony should also be\n2 The Government has attached, and moves to file, the same redacted version of the defendant's expert notice attached to its previous filings (See Dkt. Nos. 418 and 424).\n4\nDOJ-OGR-00008047",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 507 Filed 11/24/21 Page 6 of 28",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Court \"must consider whether an expert's proposed testimony would usurp the province of the judge to instruct on the law, or of the jury to make factual determinations.\" Island Intell. Prop. LLC v. Deutsche Bank AG, No. 09 Civ. 2675 (KBF), 2012 WL 526722, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2012) (citations omitted).",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "II. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DR. RYAN HALL",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Dr. Ryan Hall is a psychiatrist who frequently testifies as an expert witness.",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "According to the notice provided by the defendant, Dr. Hall \"will offer the opinions and diagnoses contained in his report, the bases for those opinions, and the significance of the diagnoses and opinions.\" (Ex. A, Def. Expert Notice, at 12).2",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "This Court should exclude Dr. Hall's testimony. As disclosed, his expert opinions have no relevance, because none bears on the facts of this case or Minor Victim-4's credibility. Any basis for those opinions is therefore also irrelevant. Similarly, absent some as-yet-undisclosed relevance, the \"significance\" of Dr. Hall's opinions have no bearing here: Because none of those opinions bear on the facts of this case or a witness's credibility, their introduction would serve only Dr. Hall's proffered fact testimony should also be",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "2 The Government has attached, and moves to file, the same redacted version of the defendant's expert notice attached to its previous filings (See Dkt. Nos. 418 and 424).",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "4",
  50. "position": "footer"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008047",
  55. "position": "footer"
  56. }
  57. ],
  58. "entities": {
  59. "people": [
  60. "Dr. Ryan Hall",
  61. "Minor Victim-4"
  62. ],
  63. "organizations": [
  64. "Deutsche Bank AG"
  65. ],
  66. "locations": [
  67. "S.D.N.Y."
  68. ],
  69. "dates": [
  70. "Feb. 14, 2012",
  71. "11/24/21"
  72. ],
  73. "reference_numbers": [
  74. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  75. "Document 507",
  76. "Dkt. Nos. 418",
  77. "Dkt. Nos. 424",
  78. "09 Civ. 2675 (KBF)"
  79. ]
  80. },
  81. "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions and is a court filing related to a criminal case."
  82. }