mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008087.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 25",
    "document_number": "508",
    "date": "11/24/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 508 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 25\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................................ii\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ....................................1\nARGUMENT....................................................................................................1\nI. Dr. Hall's Testimony Is Admissible...............................................................1\nA. Factual background..............................................................................3\nB. The government's motion is not a Rule 702 challenge...........................5\nC. Excluding Dr. Hall's expert opinions would deprive Ms. Maxwll of her constitutional rights to confrontation and to present a defense................6\n1. ...............................................................................................7\n2. .............................................................................................12\n3. Dr. Hall's opinions are not unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403...............14\n4. Rule 703 does not bar Dr. Hall from testifying....................................14\n5. Dr. Hall's \"fact testimony.\" ...............................................................16\n6. Conclusion........................................................................................17\nII. Professor Gershman's Testimony is Admissible...........................................17\nIII. This Court Should Reject the Government's Remaining Arguments...............19\nCONCLUSION...............................................................................................19\nCertificate of Service ...................................................................................21\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00008087",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 508 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 25",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................................ii\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ....................................1\nARGUMENT....................................................................................................1\nI. Dr. Hall's Testimony Is Admissible...............................................................1\nA. Factual background..............................................................................3\nB. The government's motion is not a Rule 702 challenge...........................5\nC. Excluding Dr. Hall's expert opinions would deprive Ms. Maxwll of her constitutional rights to confrontation and to present a defense................6\n1. ...............................................................................................7\n2. .............................................................................................12\n3. Dr. Hall's opinions are not unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403...............14\n4. Rule 703 does not bar Dr. Hall from testifying....................................14\n5. Dr. Hall's \"fact testimony.\" ...............................................................16\n6. Conclusion........................................................................................17\nII. Professor Gershman's Testimony is Admissible...........................................17\nIII. This Court Should Reject the Government's Remaining Arguments...............19\nCONCLUSION...............................................................................................19\nCertificate of Service ...................................................................................21",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008087",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Dr. Hall",
      "Ms. Maxwll",
      "Professor Gershman"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/24/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "508",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008087"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}