mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008246.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "529",
    "date": "12/08/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 529 Filed 12/08/21 Page 2 of 18 2 LBF3MAXC\n\n1 THE DEPUTY CLERK: The Honorable Alison J. Nathan is\n2 now presiding.\n3 United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 CR 330.\n4 Counsel, please state your name for the record.\n5 MS. COMEY: Good morning. Maurene Comey, Andrew\n6 Rohrbach, Lara Pomerantz, and Alison Moe for the government.\n7 Joining us is paralegal specialist Sunni Drescher.\n8 THE COURT: Thank you. And for the defendant?\n9 MS. STERNHEIM: Good morning, Judge Nathan. Bobbi C.\n10 Sternheim appearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, present at counsel\n11 table, along with Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff\n12 Pagliuca.\n13 THE COURT: Good morning. Please be seated.\n14 We're here for a pretrial conference in this matter.\n15 My primary purpose of today's conference is to go over the\n16 logistics of the voir dire that will begin tomorrow and\n17 finalize the list of prospective jurors who will return for\n18 voir dire, or at least we will ask to return for voir dire.\n19 I want to start with the list of jurors first. And\n20 just by background, the jury department conducted five sessions\n21 of questionnaires over the course of November 4, 5, and 12.\n22 As instructed, the parties conferred and I received\n23 your list for each of these days. One, prospective jurors both\n24 sides agreed should proceed to voir dire; two, prospective\n25 jurors that both sides agreed should be excused or struck for\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 529 Filed 12/08/21 Page 2 of 18 2 LBF3MAXC",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE DEPUTY CLERK: The Honorable Alison J. Nathan is now presiding. United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 CR 330. Counsel, please state your name for the record. MS. COMEY: Good morning. Maurene Comey, Andrew Rohrbach, Lara Pomerantz, and Alison Moe for the government. Joining us is paralegal specialist Sunni Drescher. THE COURT: Thank you. And for the defendant? MS. STERNHEIM: Good morning, Judge Nathan. Bobbi C. Sternheim appearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, present at counsel table, along with Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. THE COURT: Good morning. Please be seated. We're here for a pretrial conference in this matter. My primary purpose of today's conference is to go over the logistics of the voir dire that will begin tomorrow and finalize the list of prospective jurors who will return for voir dire, or at least we will ask to return for voir dire. I want to start with the list of jurors first. And just by background, the jury department conducted five sessions of questionnaires over the course of November 4, 5, and 12. As instructed, the parties conferred and I received your list for each of these days. One, prospective jurors both sides agreed should proceed to voir dire; two, prospective jurors that both sides agreed should be excused or struck for",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Andrew Rohrbach",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Sunni Drescher",
      "Bobbi C. Sternheim",
      "Christian Everdell",
      "Laura Menninger",
      "Jeff Pagliuca"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "12/08/21",
      "November 4",
      "November 5",
      "November 12"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 529",
      "20 CR 330"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}