mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008410.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "16",
    "document_number": "549-1",
    "date": "12/17/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1 Filed 12/17/21 Page 16 of 24 28\nLB1TMAX1\n1 law enforcement is exactly the kind of attack on the\n2 thoroughness of the government's investigation that the Fifth\n3 Circuit approved in Lindsey v. King. Provided that the rules\n4 for admitting prior inconsistent statements are satisfied, the\n5 Court concludes that this line of evidence is relevant and\n6 admissible.\n7 The defense may also cross-examine about witnesses'\n8 motives or biases for testifying, including, for example, the\n9 witnesses' motives for implicating Ms. Maxwell after Jeffrey\n10 Epstein's death. Admitting prior statements on\n11 cross-examination may require providing the jury some\n12 background information about the prior investigations so that\n13 the prior statements are understood in the proper context and\n14 the jury is provided necessary background to understand that\n15 evidence.\n16 (Continued on next page)\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00008410",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1 Filed 12/17/21 Page 16 of 24 28",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LB1TMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 law enforcement is exactly the kind of attack on the\n2 thoroughness of the government's investigation that the Fifth\n3 Circuit approved in Lindsey v. King. Provided that the rules\n4 for admitting prior inconsistent statements are satisfied, the\n5 Court concludes that this line of evidence is relevant and\n6 admissible.\n7 The defense may also cross-examine about witnesses'\n8 motives or biases for testifying, including, for example, the\n9 witnesses' motives for implicating Ms. Maxwell after Jeffrey\n10 Epstein's death. Admitting prior statements on\n11 cross-examination may require providing the jury some\n12 background information about the prior investigations so that\n13 the prior statements are understood in the proper context and\n14 the jury is provided necessary background to understand that\n15 evidence.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Continued on next page)",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008410",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "King",
      "Lindsey"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "Fifth Circuit"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "12/17/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "549-1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008410"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. It is typed and contains legal terminology and references to court cases. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}