DOJ-OGR-00008422.json 4.1 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "551",
  5. "date": "12/16/21",
  6. "document_type": "Court Order",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": true
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 551 Filed 12/16/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USD C SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 12/16/21 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes \"that many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b), and (2) is a statement admissible when the witness affirms that the 3500 material contains the inconsistent statement and also expresses disagreement with the substance.\" The parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a letter citing authority (beyond the rule itself) for their respective positions. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to indicate each disputed prior inconsistent statement that was read into the record. Letters must be submitted as soon as possible but no later than today, December 16, 2021, at 10:15 p.m. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to docket their respective letters by tomorrow, December 17, 2021, at 8:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. 1 DOJ-OGR-00008422",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 551 Filed 12/16/21 Page 1 of 2",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "stamp",
  29. "content": "USD C SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 12/16/21",
  30. "position": "margin"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER",
  35. "position": "header"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes \"that many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b), and (2) is a statement admissible when the witness affirms that the 3500 material contains the inconsistent statement and also expresses disagreement with the substance.\" The parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a letter citing authority (beyond the rule itself) for their respective positions. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to indicate each disputed prior inconsistent statement that was read into the record. Letters must be submitted as soon as possible but no later than today, December 16, 2021, at 10:15 p.m. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to docket their respective letters by tomorrow, December 17, 2021, at 8:00 a.m. SO ORDERED.",
  40. "position": "body"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "1",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008422",
  50. "position": "footer"
  51. }
  52. ],
  53. "entities": {
  54. "people": [
  55. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  56. "Alison J. Nathan"
  57. ],
  58. "organizations": [
  59. "United States District Court",
  60. "United States of America"
  61. ],
  62. "locations": [
  63. "New York"
  64. ],
  65. "dates": [
  66. "December 16, 2021",
  67. "December 17, 2021"
  68. ],
  69. "reference_numbers": [
  70. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  71. "Document 551",
  72. "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
  73. "DOJ-OGR-00008422"
  74. ]
  75. },
  76. "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a formal and official document, with a stamp indicating electronic filing. The content is related to a court case involving Ghislaine Maxwell."
  77. }