mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008513.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "57",
    "document_number": "562",
    "date": "12/17/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 562 Filed 12/17/21 Page 57 of 82\n\n1\n\nInstruction No. 40: Venue\n\n2\n\nWith respect to each of the counts in the indictment, you must also consider the issue of\n\n3\n\nvenue, namely, whether any act in furtherance of the unlawful activity charged in that count\n\n4\n\noccurred within the Southern District of New York. The Southern District of New York\n\n5\n\nencompasses the following counties: New York County (i.e., Manhattan), Bronx, Westchester,\n\n6\n\nRockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange and Sullivan Counties. Anything that occurs in any of\n\n7\n\nthose places occurs in the Southern District of New York.\n\n8\n\nVenue must be examined separately for each count in the Indictment. Venue on one\n\n9\n\ncount does not establish venue on another count, though if applicable, you may rely on the same\n\n10\n\nevidence to establish venue on multiple counts.\n\n11\n\nOn the issue of venue—and this alone—the Government need not prove venue beyond a\n\n12\n\nreasonable doubt, but only by a mere preponderance of the evidence. A \"preponderance of the\n\n13\n\nevidence\" means more likely than not. Thus, the Government, which does bear the burden of\n\n14\n\nproving venue, has satisfied that burden as to venue if you conclude that it is more likely than not\n\n15\n\nthat some act in furtherance of each charged offense occurred in the Southern District of New\n\n16\n\nYork. If, on the other hand, you find that the Government has failed to prove the venue\n\n17\n\nrequirement as to a particular offense, then you must acquit Ms. Maxwell of that offense, even if\n\n18\n\nall the other elements of the offense are proven.\n\n56\nDOJ-OGR-00008513",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 562 Filed 12/17/21 Page 57 of 82",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Instruction No. 40: Venue",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "With respect to each of the counts in the indictment, you must also consider the issue of venue, namely, whether any act in furtherance of the unlawful activity charged in that count occurred within the Southern District of New York. The Southern District of New York encompasses the following counties: New York County (i.e., Manhattan), Bronx, Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange and Sullivan Counties. Anything that occurs in any of those places occurs in the Southern District of New York.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Venue must be examined separately for each count in the Indictment. Venue on one count does not establish venue on another count, though if applicable, you may rely on the same evidence to establish venue on multiple counts.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On the issue of venue—and this alone—the Government need not prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt, but only by a mere preponderance of the evidence. A \"preponderance of the evidence\" means more likely than not. Thus, the Government, which does bear the burden of proving venue, has satisfied that burden as to venue if you conclude that it is more likely than not that some act in furtherance of each charged offense occurred in the Southern District of New York. If, on the other hand, you find that the Government has failed to prove the venue requirement as to a particular offense, then you must acquit Ms. Maxwell of that offense, even if all the other elements of the offense are proven.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "56",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008513",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Southern District of New York",
      "New York County",
      "Manhattan",
      "Bronx",
      "Westchester",
      "Rockland",
      "Putnam",
      "Dutchess",
      "Orange",
      "Sullivan Counties"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "12/17/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "562",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008513"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court instruction related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. It is a printed document with no handwritten text or stamps. The document is well-formatted and clear."
}