mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008671.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "133",
    "document_number": "563",
    "date": "12/18/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 563 Filed 12/18/21 Page 133 of 167\n1 New York Penal Law, Section 130.55; (3) In or about 1996, Maxwell provided Annie with an\n2 unsolicited massage in New Mexico, during which Annie was topless; (4) Between in or about\n3 2001 and in or about 2002, when Carolyn was under the age of 17, Maxwell and Epstein invited\n4 Carolyn to travel from Florida to a place outside of Florida with Epstein.\n5 With respect to the overt acts for Count Five, the Indictment alleges as follows: (1)\n6 Between in or about 2001 and in or about 2004, Epstein and Maxwell recruited Carolyn to\n7 engage in sex acts with Epstein at the Palm Beach Residence, after which Epstein and, at times,\n8 Maxwell provided Carolyn with hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter. Carolyn\n9 truthfully told both Epstein and Maxwell her age; (2) Between in or about 2001 and in or about\n10 2004, Epstein and Maxwell both encouraged and enticed Carolyn to recruit other girls to engage\n11 in paid sex acts with Epstein, which she did; (3) Between in or about 2001 and in or about 2004,\n12 Epstein's employees sent Carolyn gifts, including lingerie, from an address in the Southern\n13 District of New York to Carolyn's residence in Florida. For example, on one occasion in or about\n14 October of 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in\n15 Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida; (4) On multiple occasions between in or about 2001 and in or\n16 about 2004, Epstein, Maxwell, or one of Epstein's other employees called Carolyn to schedule an\n17 appointment for Carolyn to massage Epstein. For example, in or about April of 2004 and May of\n18 2004 another employee of Epstein's called Carolyn to schedule such appointments.\n19 In order for the Government to satisfy this element, it is not necessary for the\n20 Government to prove that Ms. Maxwell committed the overt act. It is sufficient for the\n21 Government to show that any of the members of the conspiracy knowingly committed some\n22 overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. Further, the overt act need not be one that is alleged in\n23 the Indictment. Rather, it can be any overt act that is substantially similar to those acts alleged in\n50\nDOJ-OGR-00008671",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 563 Filed 12/18/21 Page 133 of 167",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 New York Penal Law, Section 130.55; (3) In or about 1996, Maxwell provided Annie with an\n2 unsolicited massage in New Mexico, during which Annie was topless; (4) Between in or about\n3 2001 and in or about 2002, when Carolyn was under the age of 17, Maxwell and Epstein invited\n4 Carolyn to travel from Florida to a place outside of Florida with Epstein.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5 With respect to the overt acts for Count Five, the Indictment alleges as follows: (1)\n6 Between in or about 2001 and in or about 2004, Epstein and Maxwell recruited Carolyn to\n7 engage in sex acts with Epstein at the Palm Beach Residence, after which Epstein and, at times,\n8 Maxwell provided Carolyn with hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter. Carolyn\n9 truthfully told both Epstein and Maxwell her age; (2) Between in or about 2001 and in or about\n10 2004, Epstein and Maxwell both encouraged and enticed Carolyn to recruit other girls to engage\n11 in paid sex acts with Epstein, which she did; (3) Between in or about 2001 and in or about 2004,",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "12 Epstein's employees sent Carolyn gifts, including lingerie, from an address in the Southern\n13 District of New York to Carolyn's residence in Florida. For example, on one occasion in or about\n14 October of 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in\n15 Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida; (4) On multiple occasions between in or about 2001 and in or\n16 about 2004, Epstein, Maxwell, or one of Epstein's other employees called Carolyn to schedule an\n17 appointment for Carolyn to massage Epstein. For example, in or about April of 2004 and May of\n18 2004 another employee of Epstein's called Carolyn to schedule such appointments.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "19 In order for the Government to satisfy this element, it is not necessary for the\n20 Government to prove that Ms. Maxwell committed the overt act. It is sufficient for the\n21 Government to show that any of the members of the conspiracy knowingly committed some\n22 overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. Further, the overt act need not be one that is alleged in\n23 the Indictment. Rather, it can be any overt act that is substantially similar to those acts alleged in",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "50",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008671",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Annie",
      "Carolyn",
      "Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "New Mexico",
      "Florida",
      "Palm Beach Residence",
      "Manhattan",
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "1996",
      "2001",
      "2002",
      "2004",
      "April 2004",
      "May 2004",
      "October 2002"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 563",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008671"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case involving Maxwell and Epstein. The text describes alleged overt acts and conspiracies involving the defendants and several victims. The document is typed and does not contain any handwritten text or stamps."
}