| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "1",
- "document_number": "575",
- "date": "01/12/22",
- "document_type": "Court Order",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": true
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 575 Filed 01/12/22 Page 1 of 2\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\n20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nCounsel for Juror Number 50 has submitted a motion to intervene and to be provided a copy of the juror's completed questionnaire and voir dire. The motion has been submitted via email to allow the parties the opportunity to propose and the Court to consider any necessary redactions. The parties are ORDERED to submit via email any proposed redactions on or before January 13, 2022, justifying any such request by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). If any redactions are proposed, the Court will determine whether any are appropriate and then docket the motion.\nThe parties shall respond to Juror 50's motion on or before January 20, 2022. Upon further reflection, unless and until Juror No. 50 is permitted to intervene, he may have no standing to be heard on the question of whether an inquiry should be conducted. Accordingly, the Court withdraws the aspect of its prior order setting January 26, 2022, as the date by which counsel for Juror 50 should file a submission on the issue of the appropriateness of an inquiry. Dkt. No. 571. The Court will hear from the parties first regarding Juror 50's pending motion. Depending on the resolution of that motion, the Court will provide further guidance to counsel\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00008814",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 575 Filed 01/12/22 Page 1 of 2",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "United States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nCounsel for Juror Number 50 has submitted a motion to intervene and to be provided a copy of the juror's completed questionnaire and voir dire. The motion has been submitted via email to allow the parties the opportunity to propose and the Court to consider any necessary redactions. The parties are ORDERED to submit via email any proposed redactions on or before January 13, 2022, justifying any such request by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). If any redactions are proposed, the Court will determine whether any are appropriate and then docket the motion.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "The parties shall respond to Juror 50's motion on or before January 20, 2022. Upon further reflection, unless and until Juror No. 50 is permitted to intervene, he may have no standing to be heard on the question of whether an inquiry should be conducted. Accordingly, the Court withdraws the aspect of its prior order setting January 26, 2022, as the date by which counsel for Juror 50 should file a submission on the issue of the appropriateness of an inquiry. Dkt. No. 571. The Court will hear from the parties first regarding Juror 50's pending motion. Depending on the resolution of that motion, the Court will provide further guidance to counsel",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "stamp",
- "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _____ DATE FILED: 1/12/22",
- "position": "margin"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008814",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ghislaine Maxwell",
- "Alison J. Nathan",
- "Juror Number 50"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "United States District Court",
- "Southern District of New York",
- "Second Circuit"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York",
- "Onondaga"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "January 13, 2022",
- "January 20, 2022",
- "January 26, 2022",
- "01/12/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
- "Dkt. No. 571",
- "Document 575",
- "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a formal and official document, with no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|