| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2 of 2",
- "document_number": "576",
- "date": "01/14/22",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": true,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 576 Filed 01/14/22 Page 2 of 2\n\nFinally, in an abundance of caution, the Court assumes that while these issues are being briefed and resolved the parties are in full compliance with the law of the Second Circuit requiring notice and the Court's permission before any contact with jurors. See United States v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 98 (2d Cir. 2002) (requiring notice to the court and opposing counsel and that \"post-trial questioning of jurors must only be conducted under the strict supervision and control of the court\" (quoting United States v. Brasco, 516 F.2d 816, 819 n.4 (2d Cir. 1975))).\n\nAny failure to abide by that precedent must be reported to the Court immediately.\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: January 14, 2022 New York, New York\n\nALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge\n\n2\n\nDOJ-OGR-00008817",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 576 Filed 01/14/22 Page 2 of 2",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Finally, in an abundance of caution, the Court assumes that while these issues are being briefed and resolved the parties are in full compliance with the law of the Second Circuit requiring notice and the Court's permission before any contact with jurors. See United States v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 98 (2d Cir. 2002) (requiring notice to the court and opposing counsel and that \"post-trial questioning of jurors must only be conducted under the strict supervision and control of the court\" (quoting United States v. Brasco, 516 F.2d 816, 819 n.4 (2d Cir. 1975))).\n\nAny failure to abide by that precedent must be reported to the Court immediately.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SO ORDERED.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Dated: January 14, 2022 New York, New York",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "signature",
- "content": "Alison J. Nathan",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "2",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008817",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Alison J. Nathan"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "United States District Court"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "January 14, 2022",
- "01/14/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "Document 576",
- "DOJ-OGR-00008817"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|