mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008900.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "2020-0088",
    "date": "02/08/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case:20-0088 Document:6590 Filed 02/08/22 Page:3 of 11\nCOHEN & GRESSER LLP\n800 Third Avenue\nNew York, NY 10022\n+1 212 957 7600 phone\nwww.cohengresser.com\nChristian R. Everdell\n+1 (212) 957-7600\neverdell@cohengresser.com\nFebruary 1, 2022\nBY ECF\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10007\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\nDear Judge Nathan:\nWe write in response to the Court's order, dated January 26, 2022, requiring the defense to file a letter on the public docket justifying our request to seal Ms. Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial and accompanying exhibits (collectively, the \"Motion\") under the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Dkt. 585.\nIntroduction\nThe Motion urges the Court to right a grievous wrong that deprived Ms. Maxwell of a fundamental constitutional right - her right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury. Juror 50's responses to the jury questionnaire and questions posed to him during in-person voir dire corrupted the voir dire process and violated Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial. As set forth in the Motion, the defense believes that the existing record is clear and more than sufficient for the Court to grant Ms. Maxwell a new trial without the need for further factual development. Should the Court agree with the defense, the Motion could be unsealed and publicly docketed at the same time the Court issues its ruling with no additional delay.\n2087306.1\nDOJ-OGR-00008900",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case:20-0088 Document:6590 Filed 02/08/22 Page:3 of 11",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "COHEN & GRESSER LLP\n800 Third Avenue\nNew York, NY 10022\n+1 212 957 7600 phone\nwww.cohengresser.com",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Christian R. Everdell\n+1 (212) 957-7600\neverdell@cohengresser.com",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "February 1, 2022",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "BY ECF",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10007",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "We write in response to the Court's order, dated January 26, 2022, requiring the defense to file a letter on the public docket justifying our request to seal Ms. Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial and accompanying exhibits (collectively, the \"Motion\") under the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Dkt. 585.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Introduction",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Motion urges the Court to right a grievous wrong that deprived Ms. Maxwell of a fundamental constitutional right - her right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury. Juror 50's responses to the jury questionnaire and questions posed to him during in-person voir dire corrupted the voir dire process and violated Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial. As set forth in the Motion, the defense believes that the existing record is clear and more than sufficient for the Court to grant Ms. Maxwell a new trial without the need for further factual development. Should the Court agree with the defense, the Motion could be unsealed and publicly docketed at the same time the Court issues its ruling with no additional delay.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2087306.1\nDOJ-OGR-00008900",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Christian R. Everdell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "COHEN & GRESSER LLP",
      "United States District Court",
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "United States Courthouse",
      "40 Foley Square"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "February 1, 2022",
      "January 26, 2022"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "2020-0088",
      "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "Dkt. 585",
      "2087306.1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008900"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is well-formatted and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}