mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009918.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "101-104",
    "document_number": "A-5635",
    "date": "February 15, 2012",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,\nFebruary 15, 2012\nPage 101\nC2frdau3\n1 witness, we would have otherwise called Ms. Conrad in order to\n2 elicit these facts, so somebody looking back on this record\n3 later on has no misimpression of a defendant calling a witness\n4 who the government selectively decides to immunize. We were\n5 going to call this witness ourselves. We made a decision that\n6 her testimony is in the public interest; that's why we are\n7 seeking the immunity. I just wanted to make that clear to your\n8 Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Fine. Ms. Sternheim, if you would like,\n10 you may take a seat in the jury box during her examination.\n11 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.\n12 THE COURT: Let's bring out Ms. Conrad.\n13 MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, may I take the seat\n14 closest?\n15 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, come on down.\n16 CATHERINE M. CONRAD,\n17 called as a witness by the defendant,\n18 having been duly sworn, testified as follows:\n19 THE COURT: Would you take a seat and state your full\n20 name and spell your name slowly for the court reporter.\n21 THE WITNESS: Catherine with a C,C-A-T-H-E-R-I-N-E,\n22 Conrad, C-O-N-R-A-D.\n23 THE COURT: Mr. Gair, you may inquire.\n24 DIRECT EXAMINATION\n25 BY MR. GAIR:\n...\n(Continued on next page)\nPage 101 - Page 104 (26)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "February 15, 2012",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page 101",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2frdau3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 witness, we would have otherwise called Ms. Conrad in order to",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CATHERINE M. CONRAD,",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DIRECT EXAMINATION",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "BY MR. GAIR:",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page 101 - Page 104 (26)",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Catherine M. Conrad",
      "Ms. Sternheim",
      "Mr. Gair",
      "Paul M. Daugerdas",
      "Judge Pauley"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "February 15, 2012",
      "March 1, 2011"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5635",
      "C2frdau3",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009918"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a partial transcript of a trial or hearing involving Paul M. Daugerdas and others. The transcript includes testimony from Catherine M. Conrad, who was called as a witness by the defendant. The document is stamped with a case number and has a header indicating the case name and date."
}