DOJ-OGR-00010725.json 3.8 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": null,
  4. "document_number": null,
  5. "date": "June 25, 2022",
  6. "document_type": "Letter",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM\n212-243-1100 • Main\n917-912-9698 • Cell\n888-587-4737 • Fax\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nbcsternheim@mac.com\n\nJune 25, 2022\n\nHonorable Alison J. Nathan\nSitting By Designation\nUnited States District Court\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10010\n\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\n\nDear Judge Nathan:\n\nThis letter is submitted in response to the motion and exhibits filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, requesting permission for both individuals to give oral victim impact statements during Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing. See Dkt. 675, 675-1, 675-2. We oppose the motion for the reasons stated in our previous submissions on this issue and incorporated herein (Dkt. 667, 672):\n\nNeither Ms. Ransome nor Ms. Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the CVRA. The motion should be denied in its entirety.\n\nVery truly yours,\n\n/s/\nBOBBI C. STERNHEIM\n\ncc: Counsel of Record\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010725",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "212-243-1100 • Main\n917-912-9698 • Cell\n888-587-4737 • Fax\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nbcsternheim@mac.com",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "June 25, 2022",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nSitting By Designation\nUnited States District Court\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10010",
  30. "position": "top"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  35. "position": "top"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:\n\nThis letter is submitted in response to the motion and exhibits filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, requesting permission for both individuals to give oral victim impact statements during Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing. See Dkt. 675, 675-1, 675-2. We oppose the motion for the reasons stated in our previous submissions on this issue and incorporated herein (Dkt. 667, 672):\n\nNeither Ms. Ransome nor Ms. Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the CVRA. The motion should be denied in its entirety.",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "Very truly yours,\n\n/s/\nBOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "cc: Counsel of Record",
  50. "position": "bottom"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010725",
  55. "position": "footer"
  56. }
  57. ],
  58. "entities": {
  59. "people": [
  60. "Alison J. Nathan",
  61. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  62. "Sarah Ransome",
  63. "Elizabeth Stein",
  64. "Bobbi C. Sternheim"
  65. ],
  66. "organizations": [
  67. "Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim",
  68. "United States District Court"
  69. ],
  70. "locations": [
  71. "New York"
  72. ],
  73. "dates": [
  74. "June 25, 2022"
  75. ],
  76. "reference_numbers": [
  77. "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  78. "Dkt. 675",
  79. "Dkt. 675-1",
  80. "Dkt. 675-2",
  81. "Dkt. 667",
  82. "Dkt. 672",
  83. "DOJ-OGR-00010725"
  84. ]
  85. },
  86. "additional_notes": "The document is a letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim to Honorable Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter is dated June 25, 2022, and is on the letterhead of the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document is well-formatted and legible."
  87. }