mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010044.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "304",
    "document_number": "A-5761",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2rdau2 Brune - direct 304\n1 prompted us to doubt the voir dire and to investigate.\n2 Q. One of the questions that the judge asked on the July 22nd\n3 phonecall related to the jury consultants in this case,\n4 correct?\n5 A. That's right.\n6 Q. You identified Mr. Donohue, correct?\n7 A. That's right.\n8 Q. I believe Mr. Gair also made some statements about Mr.\n9 Donohue's relationship with his law firm, correct?\n10 A. Right.\n11 Q. Julie Blackman was identified, correct?\n12 A. That's right.\n13 Q. The Court specifically said that he was looking to\n14 understand who was involved in the process, meaning the voir\n15 dire process, between the time that the juror questionnaires\n16 were completed and the time the voir dire commenced on March\n17 1st. Do you recall that?\n18 A. I looked back at the transcript in preparation for the\n19 hearing. I think the Court in context was asking about the\n20 jury consultants, which is Mr. Schoeman responded to the\n21 Court's question by saying -- either he responded or it was in\n22 the whole thing. We were talking about the jury consultants,\n23 and Mr. Nardello was simply not a jury consultant.\n24 Q. He did investigate work related to the very topic that the\n25 judge had just indicated he was interested in, correct?\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2rdau2 Brune - direct 304",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 prompted us to doubt the voir dire and to investigate.\n2 Q. One of the questions that the judge asked on the July 22nd\n3 phonecall related to the jury consultants in this case,\n4 correct?\n5 A. That's right.\n6 Q. You identified Mr. Donohue, correct?\n7 A. That's right.\n8 Q. I believe Mr. Gair also made some statements about Mr.\n9 Donohue's relationship with his law firm, correct?\n10 A. Right.\n11 Q. Julie Blackman was identified, correct?\n12 A. That's right.\n13 Q. The Court specifically said that he was looking to\n14 understand who was involved in the process, meaning the voir\n15 dire process, between the time that the juror questionnaires\n16 were completed and the time the voir dire commenced on March\n17 1st. Do you recall that?\n18 A. I looked back at the transcript in preparation for the\n19 hearing. I think the Court in context was asking about the\n20 jury consultants, which is Mr. Schoeman responded to the\n21 Court's question by saying -- either he responded or it was in\n22 the whole thing. We were talking about the jury consultants,\n23 and Mr. Nardello was simply not a jury consultant.\n24 Q. He did investigate work related to the very topic that the\n25 judge had just indicated he was interested in, correct?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010044",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Donohue",
      "Mr. Gair",
      "Julie Blackman",
      "Mr. Schoeman",
      "Mr. Nardello"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "July 22nd",
      "March 1st"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010044"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}