mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011324.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "5",
    "document_number": "717",
    "date": "07/12/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 717 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 10\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nDecember 12, 2021\nPage 5\n(\"[R]equiring alleged victims to publicly provide their names could chill their willingness to testify for fear of having their personal histories publicized.\")\nThere is ample precedent for this request,\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\nSecond, beyond the professional basis for this request, there is another reason this Court should grant anonymity. As this Court said at the pretrial conference when granting the government's motion, \"limiting disclosure here would protect the alleged victims from potential harassment from the media and others, undue embarrassment and other\nDOJ-OGR-00011324",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 717 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 10",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nDecember 12, 2021\nPage 5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(\"[R]equiring alleged victims to publicly provide their names could chill their willingness to testify for fear of having their personal histories publicized.\")",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "There is ample precedent for this request,",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "other",
      "content": "____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________\n____________________________________________________",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Second, beyond the professional basis for this request, there is another reason this Court should grant anonymity. As this Court said at the pretrial conference when granting the government's motion, \"limiting disclosure here would protect the alleged victims from potential harassment from the media and others, undue embarrassment and other",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011324",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "December 12, 2021",
      "07/12/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "717",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011324"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions in the form of black bars covering certain text. The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case."
}