mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003810.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "212-2",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 30\nApp.-0811\n\nG4LMGIUC 7\n1 to this extent, to require the plaintiff to indicate to me and\n2 to the defense if there is anyone else who is going to be\n3 active in the litigation. I'll tell you why I feel this way.\n4 I want to be sure that we can enforce the confidential aspect\n5 of that agreement, and I think that could be critical down the\n6 line. That's the reason for those requests.\n7 Now, we also have a motion to compel.\n8 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, can I just get\n9 clarification very quickly because I don't want to have to come\n10 back to the court so I want to make sure I'm following\n11 correctly. Your ruling, because we have a deposition tomorrow\n12 that counsel was going to be assisting me with, particularly on\n13 the Fifth Amendment --\n14 THE COURT: Can't have access unless I get these\n15 materials by then. If I do, that's something else. If I do,\n16 fine. Otherwise, they can't have access to the confidential\n17 data. They can assist.\n18 MS. McCAWLEY: Can I just point something out to the\n19 Court as well.\n20 THE COURT: The plaintiff can have any lawyer she\n21 wants. The question is the confidential materials.\n22 MS. McCAWLEY: Can I just point the Court to one more\n23 issue, because this is their protective order. They now said\n24 to the Court that these two individuals are witnesses or\n25 potential witnesses. The protective order allows in Section G\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00003810",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 30",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "App.-0811",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "G4LMGIUC 7\n1 to this extent, to require the plaintiff to indicate to me and\n2 to the defense if there is anyone else who is going to be\n3 active in the litigation. I'll tell you why I feel this way.\n4 I want to be sure that we can enforce the confidential aspect\n5 of that agreement, and I think that could be critical down the\n6 line. That's the reason for those requests.\n7 Now, we also have a motion to compel.\n8 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, can I just get\n9 clarification very quickly because I don't want to have to come\n10 back to the court so I want to make sure I'm following\n11 correctly. Your ruling, because we have a deposition tomorrow\n12 that counsel was going to be assisting me with, particularly on\n13 the Fifth Amendment --\n14 THE COURT: Can't have access unless I get these\n15 materials by then. If I do, that's something else. If I do,\n16 fine. Otherwise, they can't have access to the confidential\n17 data. They can assist.\n18 MS. McCAWLEY: Can I just point something out to the\n19 Court as well.\n20 THE COURT: The plaintiff can have any lawyer she\n21 wants. The question is the confidential materials.\n22 MS. McCAWLEY: Can I just point the Court to one more\n23 issue, because this is their protective order. They now said\n24 to the Court that these two individuals are witnesses or\n25 potential witnesses. The protective order allows in Section G",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003810",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. McCAWLEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "212-2",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003810"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}