mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005626.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 24",
    "document_number": "386",
    "date": "10/29/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 386 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 24\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\nTABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................ii\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...............................................................................iii\nTABLE OF EXHIBITS .....................................................................................v\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ................................1\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND.............................................................................2\nARGUMENT .....................................................................................................3\nI. Rocchio's proposed testimony is inadmissible..............................................3\nA. Opinion 1: Minor victims are often subject to a strategic pattern of behaviors, often called grooming, that can take a variety of forms and function to render the victims vulnerable to abuse, to obscure the nature of the abuse, and to build trust and attachment with their abuser.......................................................................................................................5\n1. Rocchio's grooming opinions are unreliable...........................................5\n2. Rocchio's grooming-by-proxy opinions have no valid basis.......................9\n3. Rocchio's grooming opinions will not assist the trier of fact....................10\n4. Roccio's grooming opinions are substantially more prejudicial than probative .......................................................................................................................11\nB. Opinion 2: The relationship of trust and attachment between an alleged perpetrator and alleged victim prevents victims from being aware that what they are experiencing is abuse and can prevent disclosure.......................................................12\nC. Opinion 3: Repeated exploitation and abuse can increase the likelihood of victimization later in life and can result in long-term traumatic and psychological consequences, especially when it occurs in the context of complex trauma........................13\nD. Opinion 4: The presence of other individuals can facilitate the sexual abuse of minors .......................................................................................................................14\nE. Opinion 5: Nondisclosure, incremental disclosure, and secrecy are common among victims of sexual abuse for a variety of reasons, and that memory and disclosure of traumatic or abusive events is impacted by a number of factors, including the circumstances surrounding the trauma .............................................................15\nII. At a minimum, this Court should hold a Daubert hearing..............................17\nCONCLUSION.................................................................................................17\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00005626",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 386 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 24",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................ii\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...............................................................................iii\nTABLE OF EXHIBITS .....................................................................................v\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ................................1\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND.............................................................................2\nARGUMENT .....................................................................................................3\nI. Rocchio's proposed testimony is inadmissible..............................................3\nA. Opinion 1: Minor victims are often subject to a strategic pattern of behaviors, often called grooming, that can take a variety of forms and function to render the victims vulnerable to abuse, to obscure the nature of the abuse, and to build trust and attachment with their abuser.......................................................................................................................5\n1. Rocchio's grooming opinions are unreliable...........................................5\n2. Rocchio's grooming-by-proxy opinions have no valid basis.......................9\n3. Rocchio's grooming opinions will not assist the trier of fact....................10\n4. Roccio's grooming opinions are substantially more prejudicial than probative .......................................................................................................................11\nB. Opinion 2: The relationship of trust and attachment between an alleged perpetrator and alleged victim prevents victims from being aware that what they are experiencing is abuse and can prevent disclosure.......................................................12\nC. Opinion 3: Repeated exploitation and abuse can increase the likelihood of victimization later in life and can result in long-term traumatic and psychological consequences, especially when it occurs in the context of complex trauma........................13\nD. Opinion 4: The presence of other individuals can facilitate the sexual abuse of minors .......................................................................................................................14\nE. Opinion 5: Nondisclosure, incremental disclosure, and secrecy are common among victims of sexual abuse for a variety of reasons, and that memory and disclosure of traumatic or abusive events is impacted by a number of factors, including the circumstances surrounding the trauma .............................................................15\nII. At a minimum, this Court should hold a Daubert hearing..............................17\nCONCLUSION.................................................................................................17",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ii",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005626",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/29/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "386",
      "DOJ-OGR-00005626"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case, specifically a table of contents for a larger document. The content discusses the admissibility of testimony related to sexual abuse cases and the potential for a Daubert hearing."
}