mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006983.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "11",
    "document_number": "459",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 11 of 43\nLalWmaxC\nlet me say that I think we have time to resolve that because those matters I don't think need to be dealt with for purposes of the questionnaire but for purposes of the oral voir dire.\nDo you agree with that, Ms. Pomerantz?\nMS. POMERANTZ: Yes, I agree with that, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: OK. Anything else you want to raise based on the process I've described so far?\nMS. POMERANTZ: No. Thank you, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Ms. Sternheim.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.\nWhile we appreciate the questioning of the jurors one at a time, we do have a concern with regard to very sensitive issues being raised in the presence of media and other public, other people in the public who may have access to this. I would like to know how the Court is going to handle that.\nTHE COURT: Well, I think, as in any voir dire, there are sometimes instances in which something slightly different might be required, but I guess without knowing specifically what the issue is or what the specific concern is, I don't know that I can address it writ large. If you want to give an example, I'm happy to hear that.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Sure.\nWith regard to personal experience that may have bearing on the subject matter of the charges, that is particularly sensitive information. I think that it has a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00006983",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 11 of 43",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LalWmaxC",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "let me say that I think we have time to resolve that because those matters I don't think need to be dealt with for purposes of the questionnaire but for purposes of the oral voir dire.\nDo you agree with that, Ms. Pomerantz?\nMS. POMERANTZ: Yes, I agree with that, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: OK. Anything else you want to raise based on the process I've described so far?\nMS. POMERANTZ: No. Thank you, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Ms. Sternheim.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.\nWhile we appreciate the questioning of the jurors one at a time, we do have a concern with regard to very sensitive issues being raised in the presence of media and other public, other people in the public who may have access to this. I would like to know how the Court is going to handle that.\nTHE COURT: Well, I think, as in any voir dire, there are sometimes instances in which something slightly different might be required, but I guess without knowing specifically what the issue is or what the specific concern is, I don't know that I can address it writ large. If you want to give an example, I'm happy to hear that.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Sure.\nWith regard to personal experience that may have bearing on the subject matter of the charges, that is particularly sensitive information. I think that it has a",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006983",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Pomerantz",
      "THE COURT",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 459",
      "DOJ-OGR-00006983"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}