DOJ-OGR-00009381.json 6.3 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "92",
  4. "document_number": "1:20-cr-00338-PAE",
  5. "date": "02/24/22",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 92 of 130 A-5777 C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 320 1 time that I took that approach. I don't think it changes the 2 picture because I don't think the Westlaw report itself has the 3 picture. But what I had in making this decision was I figured 4 they'd Googled, I Googled. I figured they didn't think she was 5 a suspended lawyer based on the Google search and the note to 6 the Court. I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer. But I 7 figured if they were going to raise the Google issue, I'd lay it out. 8 9 THE COURT: Did you ever consider consulting with the 10 government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in 11 fact a suspended lawyer, given your testimony right now that it 12 was your assumption that the government was also looking into 13 jurors on the internet? 14 THE WITNESS: I did not. I think that the government 15 and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things, but 16 I know -- 17 THE COURT: Why not? Why not? If you knew that -- if 18 it was your assumption that they were expending the same kind 19 of resources researching the matter as you were, 20 THE WITNESS: I'm a little bit in a zone where I'm not 21 describing my thought processes, because I didn't think about 22 raising it with the government. But what I'm trying to say is 23 I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the 24 rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but 25 they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00009381",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 92 of 130",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "A-5777",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 320",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "1 time that I took that approach. I don't think it changes the",
  30. "position": "top"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "2 picture because I don't think the Westlaw report itself has the",
  35. "position": "top"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "3 picture. But what I had in making this decision was I figured",
  40. "position": "top"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "4 they'd Googled, I Googled. I figured they didn't think she was",
  45. "position": "top"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "5 a suspended lawyer based on the Google search and the note to",
  50. "position": "top"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "6 the Court. I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer. But I",
  55. "position": "top"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "7 figured if they were going to raise the Google issue, I'd lay",
  60. "position": "top"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "8 it out.",
  65. "position": "top"
  66. },
  67. {
  68. "type": "printed",
  69. "content": "9 THE COURT: Did you ever consider consulting with the",
  70. "position": "top"
  71. },
  72. {
  73. "type": "printed",
  74. "content": "10 government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in",
  75. "position": "top"
  76. },
  77. {
  78. "type": "printed",
  79. "content": "11 fact a suspended lawyer, given your testimony right now that it",
  80. "position": "top"
  81. },
  82. {
  83. "type": "printed",
  84. "content": "12 was your assumption that the government was also looking into",
  85. "position": "top"
  86. },
  87. {
  88. "type": "printed",
  89. "content": "13 jurors on the internet?",
  90. "position": "top"
  91. },
  92. {
  93. "type": "printed",
  94. "content": "14 THE WITNESS: I did not. I think that the government",
  95. "position": "top"
  96. },
  97. {
  98. "type": "printed",
  99. "content": "15 and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things, but",
  100. "position": "top"
  101. },
  102. {
  103. "type": "printed",
  104. "content": "16 I know --",
  105. "position": "top"
  106. },
  107. {
  108. "type": "printed",
  109. "content": "17 THE COURT: Why not? Why not? If you knew that -- if",
  110. "position": "top"
  111. },
  112. {
  113. "type": "printed",
  114. "content": "18 it was your assumption that they were expending the same kind",
  115. "position": "top"
  116. },
  117. {
  118. "type": "printed",
  119. "content": "19 of resources researching the matter as you were,",
  120. "position": "top"
  121. },
  122. {
  123. "type": "printed",
  124. "content": "20 THE WITNESS: I'm a little bit in a zone where I'm not",
  125. "position": "top"
  126. },
  127. {
  128. "type": "printed",
  129. "content": "21 describing my thought processes, because I didn't think about",
  130. "position": "top"
  131. },
  132. {
  133. "type": "printed",
  134. "content": "22 raising it with the government. But what I'm trying to say is",
  135. "position": "top"
  136. },
  137. {
  138. "type": "printed",
  139. "content": "23 I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the",
  140. "position": "top"
  141. },
  142. {
  143. "type": "printed",
  144. "content": "24 rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but",
  145. "position": "top"
  146. },
  147. {
  148. "type": "printed",
  149. "content": "25 they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more",
  150. "position": "top"
  151. },
  152. {
  153. "type": "printed",
  154. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  155. "position": "footer"
  156. },
  157. {
  158. "type": "printed",
  159. "content": "(212) 805-0300",
  160. "position": "footer"
  161. },
  162. {
  163. "type": "printed",
  164. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009381",
  165. "position": "footer"
  166. }
  167. ],
  168. "entities": {
  169. "people": [],
  170. "organizations": [
  171. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  172. ],
  173. "locations": [],
  174. "dates": [
  175. "02/24/22"
  176. ],
  177. "reference_numbers": [
  178. "1:20-cr-00338-PAE",
  179. "1616220",
  180. "A-5777",
  181. "DOJ-OGR-00009381"
  182. ]
  183. },
  184. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  185. }