DOJ-OGR-00009505.json 2.0 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "86",
  4. "document_number": "16166201",
  5. "date": "02/24/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": true,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 16166201 Filed 02/24/22 Page 86 of 117 A-5929\n\nCAC3PARC 27\n1 rely on what Catherine Conrad said.\n2 THE COURT: All right. Counsel, thank you for your\n3 arguments on the motion. Decision reserved. Have a good\n4 afternoon.\n5 MS. DAVIS: Thank you.\n6 oOo\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009505",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 16166201 Filed 02/24/22 Page 86 of 117",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "handwritten",
  19. "content": "A-5929",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "CAC3PARC 27\n1 rely on what Catherine Conrad said.\n2 THE COURT: All right. Counsel, thank you for your\n3 arguments on the motion. Decision reserved. Have a good\n4 afternoon.\n5 MS. DAVIS: Thank you.\n6 oOo",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009505",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Catherine Conrad",
  41. "MS. DAVIS"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [
  44. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "02/24/22"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cv-00330-PAE",
  52. "16166201",
  53. "A-5929",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00009505"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some handwritten annotations. The overall quality is good, but there may be some minor issues with OCR accuracy due to the font and formatting used."
  58. }