mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012881.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "130",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 130 of 261 1291 LC6VMAX4 things have been admitted during this trial with limiting instructions. I think that there is relevance to this. THE COURT: Yes. MS. STERNHEIM: And it comports with testimony; therefore, there is relevance to it. And an instruction would cure the concerns of the government. THE COURT: I'm going to continue with my ruling. Now I'm leaning towards cumulativeness, but I'll permit the dates and the emails for the reasons indicated with redaction of the content on 403 grounds. If you can prep a redacted version or, counsel, you could stipulate to the dates the emails were sent or the like, but you need to do this quickly because the jury is going to come back in. What else do we need to take up? MS. STERNHEIM: That's all. MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing from the government. THE COURT: Okay. Can you sort out how you're going to get it in? Well, I suppose -- I mean, she's off of cross at this point. Figure it out and you can do it on recross, I suppose. I'll step down for two minutes. (Recess) THE COURT: Counsel, ready to proceed? MS. POMERANTZ: Yes. MR. ROHRBACH: One matter -- THE COURT: I can't hear you, Mr. Rohrbach. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012881",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 130 of 261 1291 LC6VMAX4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "things have been admitted during this trial with limiting instructions. I think that there is relevance to this. THE COURT: Yes. MS. STERNHEIM: And it comports with testimony; therefore, there is relevance to it. And an instruction would cure the concerns of the government. THE COURT: I'm going to continue with my ruling. Now I'm leaning towards cumulativeness, but I'll permit the dates and the emails for the reasons indicated with redaction of the content on 403 grounds. If you can prep a redacted version or, counsel, you could stipulate to the dates the emails were sent or the like, but you need to do this quickly because the jury is going to come back in. What else do we need to take up? MS. STERNHEIM: That's all. MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing from the government. THE COURT: Okay. Can you sort out how you're going to get it in? Well, I suppose -- I mean, she's off of cross at this point. Figure it out and you can do it on recross, I suppose. I'll step down for two minutes. (Recess) THE COURT: Counsel, ready to proceed? MS. POMERANTZ: Yes. MR. ROHRBACH: One matter -- THE COURT: I can't hear you, Mr. Rohrbach.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012881",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "MR. ROHRBACH"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012881"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}