mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013850.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "259",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 259 of 267 2287 LCAVMAX8\nBecause I think -- as I said, I think that doesn't -- there's a basis for it in the email; it doesn't require wading into attorney-client privilege issues; and I think it gives the defense what it's looking for, as would an inquiry, which would be limited, into what the attorney said to the client. I haven't come to rest on how that's resolved, but I've indicated I think it's a close call in light of the email I've seen.\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: So you'll confer.\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nMS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: I have briefing currently on that issue.\nSo if you don't reach resolution, then I'll either -- I'll resolve or tell you what additional steps I need in order to resolve. If there are other issues that are similar, we should probably talk about timing for briefing --\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: -- following conferral.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nIs there a particular date upon which the Court would like to receive briefing from the parties about any additional privilege-related issues?\nTHE COURT: I'm fine for it to be discussed and then fully briefed again sometime on Wednesday, if that works.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013850",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 259 of 267 2287 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Because I think -- as I said, I think that doesn't -- there's a basis for it in the email; it doesn't require wading into attorney-client privilege issues; and I think it gives the defense what it's looking for, as would an inquiry, which would be limited, into what the attorney said to the client. I haven't come to rest on how that's resolved, but I've indicated I think it's a close call in light of the email I've seen.\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: So you'll confer.\nMS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.\nMS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: I have briefing currently on that issue.\nSo if you don't reach resolution, then I'll either -- I'll resolve or tell you what additional steps I need in order to resolve. If there are other issues that are similar, we should probably talk about timing for briefing --\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: -- following conferral.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\nIs there a particular date upon which the Court would like to receive briefing from the parties about any additional privilege-related issues?\nTHE COURT: I'm fine for it to be discussed and then fully briefed again sometime on Wednesday, if that works.\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013850",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "Wednesday"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013850"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}