mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014596.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "196",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 196 of 257 3030 LCKVMAX8 Charge\n1 actually committed.\n2 By contrast, the substantive counts require proof that\n3 the crime charge was actually committed, but do not require\n4 proof of an agreement. Of course, if a defendant both\n5 participates in a conspiracy to commit a crime and then\n6 actually commits that crime, that defendant may be guilty of\n7 both the conspiracy and the substantive crime, as I'll instruct\n8 you shortly.\n9 We will turn first to the substantive charges in the\n10 indictment, which are more convenient to consider before the\n11 conspiracy charges. Therefore, I'll instruct you first on\n12 Counts Two, Four, and Six, and then I'll instruct you on Counts\n13 One, Three, and Five.\n14 Instruction No. 13. Count Two, enticement to engage\n15 in an illegal sexual activity, the statute.\n16 The relevant statute for Count Two is Title 18, United\n17 States Code, Section 2422, which provides that: \"Whoever\n18 knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any\n19 individual to travel in interstate commerce or in any territory\n20 or possession of the United States to engage in any sexual\n21 activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal\n22 offense\" is guilty of a federal crime.\n23 Instruction No. 14. Count Two, enticement to engage\n24 in illegal sexual activity, the elements.\n25 To prove the defendant guilty of Count Two, the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014596",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 196 of 257 3030 LCKVMAX8 Charge",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 actually committed.\n2 By contrast, the substantive counts require proof that\n3 the crime charge was actually committed, but do not require\n4 proof of an agreement. Of course, if a defendant both\n5 participates in a conspiracy to commit a crime and then\n6 actually commits that crime, that defendant may be guilty of\n7 both the conspiracy and the substantive crime, as I'll instruct\n8 you shortly.\n9 We will turn first to the substantive charges in the\n10 indictment, which are more convenient to consider before the\n11 conspiracy charges. Therefore, I'll instruct you first on\n12 Counts Two, Four, and Six, and then I'll instruct you on Counts\n13 One, Three, and Five.\n14 Instruction No. 13. Count Two, enticement to engage\n15 in an illegal sexual activity, the statute.\n16 The relevant statute for Count Two is Title 18, United\n17 States Code, Section 2422, which provides that: \"Whoever\n18 knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any\n19 individual to travel in interstate commerce or in any territory\n20 or possession of the United States to engage in any sexual\n21 activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal\n22 offense\" is guilty of a federal crime.\n23 Instruction No. 14. Count Two, enticement to engage\n24 in illegal sexual activity, the elements.\n25 To prove the defendant guilty of Count Two, the",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014596",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "2422",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014596"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a criminal case. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is from the Southern District Court and references specific counts and statutes."
}