| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "4",
- "document_number": "613",
- "date": "02/24/22",
- "document_type": "Table of Authorities",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 4 of 66\n\nTable of Authorities\n\nCases\n\nAdams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (1980) ............................................................28\nArizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279 (1991) ....................................................22\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...................................................54\nBurton v. Johnson, 948 F.2d 1150 (10th Cir. 1991)...........................................29, 30\nClark v. United States, 289 U.S. 1 (1933).........................................................27\nCunningham v. Shoop, __ F.4th __, 2022 WL 92594 (6th Cir. Nos. 11-3005/20-3429, Jan. 10, 2022)...............................................................50\nDavis v. Bombardier Recreational Prod., Inc., No. 3:11CV236-TSL-MTP, 2012 WL 112202 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 12, 2012) .......................................................52\nDyer v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 970 (9th Cir.1998) ..................................................27, 30\nGonzales v. Thomas, 99 F.3d 978 (10th Cir. 1996).............................................36\nHunley v. Godinez, 975 F.2d 316 (7th Cir. 1992) ................................................29\nIn re Gucci, 126 F.3d 380 (2d Cir. 1997)..........................................................52\nIn re Sealed Search Warrants Issued June 4 & 5, 2008, No. 08-M-208 (DRH), 2008 WL 5667021 (N.D.N.Y. July 14, 2008) .......................................................55\nJohn Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146 (1989)....................................52\nLinda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614 (1973)....................................................51\nLugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) .......................54\nMazzeo v. Gibbons, No. 2:08-CV-01387-RLH-PA, 2010 WL 3910072 (D. Nev. Sept. 30, 2010)...............................................................53\n\niv\nDOJ-OGR-00009005",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 4 of 66",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Table of Authorities",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Cases",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (1980) ............................................................28\nArizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279 (1991) ....................................................22\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...................................................54\nBurton v. Johnson, 948 F.2d 1150 (10th Cir. 1991)...........................................29, 30\nClark v. United States, 289 U.S. 1 (1933).........................................................27\nCunningham v. Shoop, __ F.4th __, 2022 WL 92594 (6th Cir. Nos. 11-3005/20-3429, Jan. 10, 2022)...............................................................50\nDavis v. Bombardier Recreational Prod., Inc., No. 3:11CV236-TSL-MTP, 2012 WL 112202 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 12, 2012) .......................................................52\nDyer v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 970 (9th Cir.1998) ..................................................27, 30\nGonzales v. Thomas, 99 F.3d 978 (10th Cir. 1996).............................................36\nHunley v. Godinez, 975 F.2d 316 (7th Cir. 1992) ................................................29\nIn re Gucci, 126 F.3d 380 (2d Cir. 1997)..........................................................52\nIn re Sealed Search Warrants Issued June 4 & 5, 2008, No. 08-M-208 (DRH), 2008 WL 5667021 (N.D.N.Y. July 14, 2008) .......................................................55\nJohn Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146 (1989)....................................52\nLinda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614 (1973)....................................................51\nLugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) .......................54\nMazzeo v. Gibbons, No. 2:08-CV-01387-RLH-PA, 2010 WL 3910072 (D. Nev. Sept. 30, 2010)...............................................................53",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "iv",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009005",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Adams",
- "Texas",
- "Fulminante",
- "Arizona",
- "Maxwell",
- "Brown",
- "Johnson",
- "Burton",
- "Clark",
- "Cunningham",
- "Shoop",
- "Davis",
- "Bombardier Recreational Prod., Inc.",
- "Dyer",
- "Calderon",
- "Gonzales",
- "Thomas",
- "Hunley",
- "Godinez",
- "Gucci",
- "John Doe Agency",
- "John Doe Corp.",
- "Linda R.S.",
- "Richard D.",
- "Lugosch",
- "Pyramid Co. of Onondaga",
- "Mazzeo",
- "Gibbons"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "U.S.",
- "F.3d",
- "Cir.",
- "U.S. Supreme Court",
- "S.D. Miss.",
- "N.D.N.Y.",
- "D. Nev."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "Texas",
- "Arizona",
- "New York"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "1980",
- "1991",
- "2019",
- "1991",
- "1933",
- "2022",
- "2012",
- "1998",
- "1996",
- "1992",
- "1997",
- "2008",
- "1989",
- "1973",
- "2006",
- "2010"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "613",
- "448 U.S. 38",
- "499 U.S. 279",
- "929 F.3d 41",
- "948 F.2d 1150",
- "289 U.S. 1",
- "__ F.4th __",
- "2022 WL 92594",
- "3:11CV236-TSL-MTP",
- "2012 WL 112202",
- "151 F.3d 970",
- "99 F.3d 978",
- "975 F.2d 316",
- "126 F.3d 380",
- "08-M-208 (DRH)",
- "2008 WL 5667021",
- "493 U.S. 146",
- "410 U.S. 614",
- "435 F.3d 110",
- "2:08-CV-01387-RLH-PA",
- "2010 WL 3910072"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document is a table of authorities from a legal case. It appears to be a printed document with no handwritten text or stamps. The text is clear and legible."
- }
|