mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009382.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "93",
    "document_number": "1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 130",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 130 A-5778\n321\nC2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect\n1 information than I do, so I figured if they thought there was\n2 something to it, they'd raise it.\n3 So I didn't think, oh, wow, here's the Google search\n4 and here's the note, let me bring this to the government's\n5 attention. I thought the government had the same thing that we\n6 had.\n7 THE COURT: All right. Anything further?\n8 MR. OKULA: No, your Honor, not with respect to this\n9 witness. But before we go on to the next witness, I just want\n10 to make a representation to the Court and I'd be happy to set\n11 forth in a declaration if the Court requires, but Ms. Brune in\n12 the end of her testimony was I think speculating about what the\n13 state of the government's knowledge was and what we were doing\n14 after we received the note.\n15 As a matter of fact, Judge, we didn't think that on\n16 the face of the note that it suggested Brady or any violation.\n17 We turned it over nonetheless, but we didn't conduct any\n18 independent investigation after we got the letter because we\n19 viewed it as pretty much innocuous. So to the extent that\n20 Ms. Brune was speculating that I assume or I think or I\n21 believed the government was doing its own Google research and\n22 found the same thing in fact that is not true. The first time\n23 we found out about it was when we saw the motion that the\n24 defendants filed.\n25 THE COURT: All right. Anything further,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009382",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5778",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "321\nC2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 information than I do, so I figured if they thought there was\n2 something to it, they'd raise it.\n3 So I didn't think, oh, wow, here's the Google search\n4 and here's the note, let me bring this to the government's\n5 attention. I thought the government had the same thing that we\n6 had.\n7 THE COURT: All right. Anything further?\n8 MR. OKULA: No, your Honor, not with respect to this\n9 witness. But before we go on to the next witness, I just want\n10 to make a representation to the Court and I'd be happy to set\n11 forth in a declaration if the Court requires, but Ms. Brune in\n12 the end of her testimony was I think speculating about what the\n13 state of the government's knowledge was and what we were doing\n14 after we received the note.\n15 As a matter of fact, Judge, we didn't think that on\n16 the face of the note that it suggested Brady or any violation.\n17 We turned it over nonetheless, but we didn't conduct any\n18 independent investigation after we got the letter because we\n19 viewed it as pretty much innocuous. So to the extent that\n20 Ms. Brune was speculating that I assume or I think or I\n21 believed the government was doing its own Google research and\n22 found the same thing in fact that is not true. The first time\n23 we found out about it was when we saw the motion that the\n24 defendants filed.\n25 THE COURT: All right. Anything further,",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009382",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Brune",
      "Brady",
      "MR. OKULA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00338-PAE",
      "A-5778",
      "C2GFDAU3",
      "161",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009382"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}