mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009392.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "103",
    "document_number": "A-5788",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20cr00330 Document 612 Filed 02/24/22 Page 103 of 130 A-5788\n\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein 331\n1 A. I'm not sure I understand --\n2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name\n3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to\n4 that.\n5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: Very well.\n7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?\n10 A. No.\n11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?\n12 A. No.\n13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?\n14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.\n15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had\n16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.\n17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended\n18 attorney?\n19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was\n20 only on a number of them.\n21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving\n22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa\n23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009392",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20cr00330 Document 612 Filed 02/24/22 Page 103 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "A-5788",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 331",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. I'm not sure I understand --\n2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name\n3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to\n4 that.\n5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: Very well.\n7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?\n10 A. No.\n11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?\n12 A. No.\n13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?\n14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.\n15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had\n16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.\n17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended\n18 attorney?\n19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was\n20 only on a number of them.\n21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving\n22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa\n23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009392",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Edelstein",
      "Susan Brune",
      "Theresa Trzaskoma",
      "Randy Kim",
      "Jesus",
      "Mr. Schectman",
      "Mr. Okula"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "San Francisco"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22",
      "May 12th",
      "July 15"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20cr00330",
      "Document 612",
      "A-5788",
      "C2GFDAU3",
      "331",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009392"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some handwritten annotations. The quality is generally good, but there may be some minor redactions or damage not visible in the provided image."
}