DOJ-OGR-00009396.json 3.8 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "107",
  4. "document_number": "A-5792",
  5. "date": "02/24/22",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330 Document 615-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 107 of 130\nA-5792\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein 335\n1 trial, correct?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. Do you remember who was on those e-mail exchanges that\n4 identified Robert Conrad as the father?\n5 A. I believe Theresa Trzaskoma and David Benhamou.\n6 Q. Were you informed of that at the time?\n7 A. No.\n8 Q. By the way, what was your role, what was your principal\n9 duty in connection with the trial, the defense of David Parse?\n10 A. I don't know that I had a principal role. I was involved\n11 in various parts of it. I focused on the opening and the\n12 closing statements, the expert testimony, several of the\n13 witnesses.\n14 Q. Voir dire?\n15 A. No.\n16 Q. Did you assist in voir dire?\n17 A. No.\n18 Q. Not at all?\n19 A. Well, I participated in a couple of meetings where jurors\n20 were discussed prior to voir dire and then my role really at\n21 that time was to focus on the opening statement.\n22 Q. Now, you received the dossier from, well, the link to the\n23 dossier and examined it, are you saying after you received a\n24 copy of the Catherine Conrad letter?\n25 A. I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier. I received the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009396",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330 Document 615-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 107 of 130",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "A-5792",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 335",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "1 trial, correct?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. Do you remember who was on those e-mail exchanges that\n4 identified Robert Conrad as the father?\n5 A. I believe Theresa Trzaskoma and David Benhamou.\n6 Q. Were you informed of that at the time?\n7 A. No.\n8 Q. By the way, what was your role, what was your principal\n9 duty in connection with the trial, the defense of David Parse?\n10 A. I don't know that I had a principal role. I was involved\n11 in various parts of it. I focused on the opening and the\n12 closing statements, the expert testimony, several of the\n13 witnesses.\n14 Q. Voir dire?\n15 A. No.\n16 Q. Did you assist in voir dire?\n17 A. No.\n18 Q. Not at all?\n19 A. Well, I participated in a couple of meetings where jurors\n20 were discussed prior to voir dire and then my role really at\n21 that time was to focus on the opening statement.\n22 Q. Now, you received the dossier from, well, the link to the\n23 dossier and examined it, are you saying after you received a\n24 copy of the Catherine Conrad letter?\n25 A. I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier. I received the",
  30. "position": "main"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009396",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [
  45. "Robert Conrad",
  46. "Theresa Trzaskoma",
  47. "David Benhamou",
  48. "David Parse",
  49. "Catherine Conrad",
  50. "Edelstein"
  51. ],
  52. "organizations": [
  53. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  54. ],
  55. "locations": [],
  56. "dates": [
  57. "02/24/22"
  58. ],
  59. "reference_numbers": [
  60. "1:20-cr-00330",
  61. "615-2",
  62. "A-5792",
  63. "C2GFDAU3",
  64. "DOJ-OGR-00009396"
  65. ]
  66. },
  67. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  68. }