mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009412.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "123",
    "document_number": "1:20-cv-00330-PAE",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 61102/20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 123 of 130\nA-5808\n\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein 351\n1 said that you had a conversation with Susan Brune, yes or no?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. Okay, and as a result of that discussion you decided what\n4 you would omit from the brief, correct?\n5 A. I wouldn't characterize it as omit.\n6 Q. Okay, let's just stop there. You and Susan Brune discussed\n7 the fact that you wouldn't include certain things you knew\n8 about before the juror note in your brief, yes or no?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. So isn't that a decision that you made with Susan Brune\n11 about what you would omit from the brief, yes or no?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. So when you answered my questions a few minutes ago when I\n14 asked you whether you decided with Susan Brune that you would\n15 omit something, you said no. Was that an untrue answer before?\n16 A. Well, I'm not sure if that was the exact question. I'm\n17 not -- I'm not trying to lie here or give you a hard time.\n18 These are difficult questions to answer. In looking back and\n19 trying to figure out what the process was for writing this\n20 brief, if I had to do it over again would I do it differently?\n21 Yes. In hindsight should we have dropped a footnote saying\n22 that we, you know, knew that there was a suspended lawyer with\n23 the same name? If I had to do it over again I would certainly\n24 do that. And I'm very sorry for any misimpression the brief\n25 has created.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009412",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 61102/20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 123 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5808",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 351",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "said that you had a conversation with Susan Brune, yes or no?\nA. Yes.\nQ. Okay, and as a result of that discussion you decided what\nyou would omit from the brief, correct?\nA. I wouldn't characterize it as omit.\nQ. Okay, let's just stop there. You and Susan Brune discussed\nthe fact that you wouldn't include certain things you knew\nabout before the juror note in your brief, yes or no?\nA. Yes.\nQ. So isn't that a decision that you made with Susan Brune\nabout what you would omit from the brief, yes or no?\nA. Yes.\nQ. So when you answered my questions a few minutes ago when I\nasked you whether you decided with Susan Brune that you would\nomit something, you said no. Was that an untrue answer before?\nA. Well, I'm not sure if that was the exact question. I'm\nnot -- I'm not trying to lie here or give you a hard time.\nThese are difficult questions to answer. In looking back and\ntrying to figure out what the process was for writing this\nbrief, if I had to do it over again would I do it differently?\nYes. In hindsight should we have dropped a footnote saying\nthat we, you know, knew that there was a suspended lawyer with\nthe same name? If I had to do it over again I would certainly\ndo that. And I'm very sorry for any misimpression the brief\nhas created.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009412",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Susan Brune",
      "Edelstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-00330-PAE",
      "61102/20",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009412",
      "A-5808",
      "C2GFDAU3"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}