mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009415.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "126",
    "document_number": "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22 Page 126 of 130\nA-5811\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein - cross 354\n1 A. We didn't know that Juror No. 1 was the suspended lawyer\n2 and we didn't know we had a motion.\n3 Q. Any discussion of raising it as an appellate issue?\n4 A. No.\n5 Q. And why not?\n6 A. For the same reasons. We didn't know that Juror No. 1 was\n7 the suspended lawyer.\n8 MR. SCHECTMAN: No further questions, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Mr. Okula?\n10 MR. OKULA: I'm waiting for the defense, but I see\n11 absence from here. May I ask one or two questions from here,\n12 your Honor?\n13 THE COURT: You may.\n14 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n15 BY MR. OKULA:\n16 Q. Do I understand you to just testify that you specifically\n17 discussed with Susan Brune and Theresa Trzaskoma in the park\n18 about whether you were going to bring it to the Court's\n19 attention or not?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And you decided you would not?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And the ultimate decision of that discussion was that you\n24 were going to call it off and not even do an investigation,\n25 right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009415",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22 Page 126 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5811",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein - cross 354",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. We didn't know that Juror No. 1 was the suspended lawyer\n2 and we didn't know we had a motion.\n3 Q. Any discussion of raising it as an appellate issue?\n4 A. No.\n5 Q. And why not?\n6 A. For the same reasons. We didn't know that Juror No. 1 was\n7 the suspended lawyer.\n8 MR. SCHECTMAN: No further questions, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Mr. Okula?\n10 MR. OKULA: I'm waiting for the defense, but I see\n11 absence from here. May I ask one or two questions from here,\n12 your Honor?\n13 THE COURT: You may.\n14 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n15 BY MR. OKULA:\n16 Q. Do I understand you to just testify that you specifically\n17 discussed with Susan Brune and Theresa Trzaskoma in the park\n18 about whether you were going to bring it to the Court's\n19 attention or not?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And you decided you would not?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And the ultimate decision of that discussion was that you\n24 were going to call it off and not even do an investigation,\n25 right?",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009415",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Edelstein",
      "Mr. Okula",
      "Susan Brune",
      "Theresa Trzaskoma",
      "MR. SCHECTMAN"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "611",
      "C2GFDAU3",
      "A-5811",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009415"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}