mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009426.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "73",
    "document_number": "1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 73 of 117",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 365\n1 Q. Would you have liked to receive that information in order\n2 to make a better assessment of your own about whether Juror No.\n3 1 was the suspended attorney? After all, more information is\n4 better, isn't it?\n5 A. It did not occur to me at the time to ask for more\n6 information.\n7 Q. I didn't ask you whether it occurred to you at the time.\n8 Would you have wanted more information? Would that have helped\n9 your analysis?\n10 A. I don't know whether it would have helped my analysis. I\n11 concluded from the fact that she was telling me that the voir dire\n12 answer had said that this person had not gone to law\n13 school, that this was not an issue.\n14 Q. Do you really mean what you just said, that you don't think\n15 more information would have helped your analysis, Mr. Schoeman?\n16 A. I'm telling you I don't know whether more information would\n17 have helped my analysis. I'm telling you that I reached a\n18 conclusion based on that information.\n19 Q. Would you agree with me that if you have two people, one\n20 named Catherine Conrad, another named Catherine Conrad, and you\n21 were given information about their middle initials, that they\n22 share the same middle initial, that it made it statistically\n23 more likely that was the same person?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 MR. OKULA: Judge, I have nothing further. Thank you.\nMR. OKULA: Southern District Reporters, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009426",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 365",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. Would you have liked to receive that information in order\n2 to make a better assessment of your own about whether Juror No.\n3 1 was the suspended attorney? After all, more information is\n4 better, isn't it?\n5 A. It did not occur to me at the time to ask for more\n6 information.\n7 Q. I didn't ask you whether it occurred to you at the time.\n8 Would you have wanted more information? Would that have helped\n9 your analysis?\n10 A. I don't know whether it would have helped my analysis. I\n11 concluded from the fact that she was telling me that the voir dire\n12 answer had said that this person had not gone to law\n13 school, that this was not an issue.\n14 Q. Do you really mean what you just said, that you don't think\n15 more information would have helped your analysis, Mr. Schoeman?\n16 A. I'm telling you I don't know whether more information would\n17 have helped my analysis. I'm telling you that I reached a\n18 conclusion based on that information.\n19 Q. Would you agree with me that if you have two people, one\n20 named Catherine Conrad, another named Catherine Conrad, and you\n21 were given information about their middle initials, that they\n22 share the same middle initial, that it made it statistically\n23 more likely that was the same person?\n24 A. Yes.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. OKULA: Judge, I have nothing further. Thank you.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. OKULA: Southern District Reporters, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009426",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Schoeman",
      "Mr. Schoeman",
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "Mr. Okula"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Southern District Reporters, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-03038-PAE",
      "616-1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009426",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}