mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009438.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "18",
    "document_number": "1616620",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 18 of 117\nA-5834\n\nC2grdau4 377\n1 THE COURT: Does the defendant Parse rest?\n2 MR. SHECHTMAN: We do, your Honor.\n3 THE COURT: Does any defendant have any additional\n4 evidence to offer to the Court on this hearing?\n5 MS. McCARTHY: Not from Mr. Field, your Honor.\n6 MR. ROTERT: We do not, your Honor.\n7 MR. SKLARSKY: No, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Does the government have anything further?\n9 MR. OKULA: Thank you, your Honor. We do not.\n10 THE COURT: The government rests?\n11 MR. OKULA: We do indeed, your Honor.\n12 THE COURT: I would like to get some post-hearing\n13 briefing from the parties. It seems to me that the simplest\n14 way to do it would be to have the parties submit simultaneous\n15 briefs and then I give you a very short responsive brief if you\n16 felt it was necessary to respond to something that the other\n17 side said. We'll fix a schedule in a moment.\n18 Obviously, in the briefs I want the parties to provide\n19 the Court with what they believe the strongest results are of\n20 this evidentiary hearing. Second, in the post-hearing briefs\n21 I'd like the question of whether the attorneys for Brune &\n22 Richard involved in this matter would have satisfied their\n23 ethical obligations if they failed to disclose the contents of\n24 the July 21 letter and their complete investigation into Juror\n25 No. 1.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009438",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 18 of 117",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5834",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2grdau4 377",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: Does the defendant Parse rest?\n2 MR. SHECHTMAN: We do, your Honor.\n3 THE COURT: Does any defendant have any additional\n4 evidence to offer to the Court on this hearing?\n5 MS. McCARTHY: Not from Mr. Field, your Honor.\n6 MR. ROTERT: We do not, your Honor.\n7 MR. SKLARSKY: No, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Does the government have anything further?\n9 MR. OKULA: Thank you, your Honor. We do not.\n10 THE COURT: The government rests?\n11 MR. OKULA: We do indeed, your Honor.\n12 THE COURT: I would like to get some post-hearing\n13 briefing from the parties. It seems to me that the simplest\n14 way to do it would be to have the parties submit simultaneous\n15 briefs and then I give you a very short responsive brief if you\n16 felt it was necessary to respond to something that the other\n17 side said. We'll fix a schedule in a moment.\n18 Obviously, in the briefs I want the parties to provide\n19 the Court with what they believe the strongest results are of\n20 this evidentiary hearing. Second, in the post-hearing briefs\n21 I'd like the question of whether the attorneys for Brune &\n22 Richard involved in this matter would have satisfied their\n23 ethical obligations if they failed to disclose the contents of\n24 the July 21 letter and their complete investigation into Juror\n25 No. 1.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009438",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. SHECHTMAN",
      "MS. McCARTHY",
      "MR. ROTERT",
      "MR. SKLARSKY",
      "MR. OKULA",
      "Brune",
      "Richard"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "July 21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "1616620",
      "02/24/22",
      "A-5834",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009438"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}