| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "1",
- "document_number": "544",
- "date": "08/07/12",
- "document_type": "Affidavit",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 544 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 2\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nv.\nPAUL M. DAUGERDAS,\nDONNA GUERIN,\nDENIS FIELD, and\nDAVID PARSE,\nDefendants.\nSTATE OF NEW YORK )\nCOUNTY OF NEW YORK )\nDAVID PARSE, being duly sworn, deposes and says:\n1. My name is David Parse, and I am a defendant in the above-captioned case.\n2. During jury selection (or shortly thereafter), I heard one of the lawyers at the Brune firm (I believe it was Theresa Trzaskoma) say that there was a prospective juror (or a juror) who had the same name as a suspended attorney but that it was not the same person. I cannot recall if the lawyer was speaking to me or if I overheard her speaking to someone else.\n3. A week after the verdict, I met with the Brune lawyers to discuss possible post-trial motions and appellate issues. The possibility of a juror misconduct issue was not raised.\n4. It was not until after the Brune firm filed its motion for a new trial that I learned that prior to jury deliberations the issue of Conrad being a suspended lawyer had resurfaced.\nMore precisely, to the best of my memory, it was after the July 15, 2011 conference call that I learned (i) that on May 12, 2011, Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that Juror No. 1\n3689133.1\nDOJ-OGR-00009476",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nv.\nPAUL M. DAUGERDAS,\nDONNA GUERIN,\nDENIS FIELD, and\nDAVID PARSE,\nDefendants.",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "STATE OF NEW YORK )\nCOUNTY OF NEW YORK )",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DAVID PARSE, being duly sworn, deposes and says:",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1. My name is David Parse, and I am a defendant in the above-captioned case.\n2. During jury selection (or shortly thereafter), I heard one of the lawyers at the Brune firm (I believe it was Theresa Trzaskoma) say that there was a prospective juror (or a juror) who had the same name as a suspended attorney but that it was not the same person. I cannot recall if the lawyer was speaking to me or if I overheard her speaking to someone else.\n3. A week after the verdict, I met with the Brune lawyers to discuss possible post-trial motions and appellate issues. The possibility of a juror misconduct issue was not raised.\n4. It was not until after the Brune firm filed its motion for a new trial that I learned that prior to jury deliberations the issue of Conrad being a suspended lawyer had resurfaced.\nMore precisely, to the best of my memory, it was after the July 15, 2011 conference call that I learned (i) that on May 12, 2011, Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that Juror No. 1",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "3689133.1",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009476",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "David Parse",
- "Theresa Trzaskoma",
- "Conrad",
- "Paul M. Daugerdas",
- "Donna Guerin",
- "Denis Field"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Brune firm",
- "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
- "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "July 15, 2011",
- "May 12, 2011",
- "08/07/12"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:09-cr-00581-WHP",
- "Document 544",
- "3689133.1",
- "DOJ-OGR-00009476",
- "S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing, specifically an affidavit from David Parse. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is in good condition, with clear and legible text."
- }
|