mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009494.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "75",
    "document_number": "6163/20",
    "date": "08/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 6163/20 Filed 08/24/22 Page 75 of 117 A-5918\n\nCAC3PARC 16\n1 MS. DAVIS: Yes, please, your Honor.\n2 Good afternoon, your Honor. I'm glad to see that\n3 Mr. Shechtman has conceded that other than this particular\n4 area, Mr. Parse did in fact receive what can only be described\n5 as a platinum plated defense with a defense team that most\n6 defendants can only dream of.\n7 MR. SHECHTMAN: I don't think I quite went that far,\n8 your Honor.\n9 MS. DAVIS: I do think, though, that had Mr. Shechtman\n10 been here at trial and seen the forces that were mustered in\n11 Mr. Parse's favor, he would have to admit that it is a rare\n12 scene in such a courtroom for an individual defendant.\n13 Your Honor, the crux of it is that defendant Parse is\n14 seeking to be rewarded now for the strategic choices of his\n15 attorney regarding Catherine Conrad and their knowledge of her.\n16 Choices for which he has already benefited in the form of\n17 acquittals on the conspiracy and the tax evasion counts. We\n18 submit, as we said in our papers, that we believe that\n19 Mr. Shechtman has met neither prong of the Strickland standard\n20 in that he cannot show ineffective assistance of counsel and he\n21 cannot show prejudice.\n22 This Court in its ruling on the motion for new trial\n23 regarding Catherine Conrad has already found that the Brune &\n24 Richard law firm knew that Catherine Conrad and Juror No. 1\n25 were the same person and chose to gamble with the jury that\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009494",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 6163/20 Filed 08/24/22 Page 75 of 117 A-5918",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CAC3PARC 16",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. DAVIS: Yes, please, your Honor.\n2 Good afternoon, your Honor. I'm glad to see that\n3 Mr. Shechtman has conceded that other than this particular\n4 area, Mr. Parse did in fact receive what can only be described\n5 as a platinum plated defense with a defense team that most\n6 defendants can only dream of.\n7 MR. SHECHTMAN: I don't think I quite went that far,\n8 your Honor.\n9 MS. DAVIS: I do think, though, that had Mr. Shechtman\n10 been here at trial and seen the forces that were mustered in\n11 Mr. Parse's favor, he would have to admit that it is a rare\n12 scene in such a courtroom for an individual defendant.\n13 Your Honor, the crux of it is that defendant Parse is\n14 seeking to be rewarded now for the strategic choices of his\n15 attorney regarding Catherine Conrad and their knowledge of her.\n16 Choices for which he has already benefited in the form of\n17 acquittals on the conspiracy and the tax evasion counts. We\n18 submit, as we said in our papers, that we believe that\n19 Mr. Shechtman has met neither prong of the Strickland standard\n20 in that he cannot show ineffective assistance of counsel and he\n21 cannot show prejudice.\n22 This Court in its ruling on the motion for new trial\n23 regarding Catherine Conrad has already found that the Brune &\n24 Richard law firm knew that Catherine Conrad and Juror No. 1\n25 were the same person and chose to gamble with the jury that",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009494",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. DAVIS",
      "MR. SHECHTMAN",
      "Mr. Parse",
      "Catherine Conrad"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Brune & Richard law firm",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00336-PAE",
      "6163/20",
      "A-5918",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009494"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}