mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009922.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "117-120",
    "document_number": "A-5639",
    "date": "February 15, 2012",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,\nFebruary 15, 2012\nPage 117 - Page 120 (30)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS\n... (full text content of the pages 117-120)",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "February 15, 2012",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 117",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 was crazy talk?\n2 MR. OKULA: Objection.\n3 A. No, I'm not a psychologist.\n4 THE COURT: Sustained.\n5 Q. Can you explain the connection, if any, between what you said about Judge Pauley receiving another Clinton appointment and the matters that were going to be discussed?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009922",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Paul M. Daugerdas",
      "Judge Pauley",
      "Clinton"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "February 15, 2012",
      "December 20th",
      "February 15th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5639",
      "C2FFDAU4",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009922"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The content is a testimony or deposition related to a legal case involving Paul M. Daugerdas. There are no visible redactions or significant damage to the document."
}