mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010004.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "264",
    "document_number": "A-5721",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 264\n1 A. Well, not necessarily all at once, but we certainly had\n2 resources and I certainly did not ask that more be done\n3 awaiting the answers from the prospective juror on voir dire.\n4 Q. And you could have told the Court at that point, correct?\n5 A. I certainly could have said to the Court that there is a\n6 Google search out there that reveals that there's a suspended\n7 lawyer by the name of Catherine Conrad.\n8 Q. And you didn't do that?\n9 A. I did not do that.\n10 Q. Now you appreciated, it sounds to me just from what you\n11 said, pretty instantly, that this is potentially significant\n12 information, correct?\n13 A. If it's the same person, it's very significant information.\n14 I certainly appreciated that.\n15 Q. No one -- you didn't require anyone to have to explain that\n16 to you, correct?\n17 A. No. I mean, we had a lot of Google-type information on a\n18 lot of jurors and, you know, it's a big metropolitan area.\n19 Some of that --\n20 Q. Ms. Brune, I asked you a very specific question.\n21 A. Can --\n22 Q. You did not require anybody else to explain to you the\n23 significance of that information. Is that true?\n24 A. If that's your question, the answer is no, I did not ask\n25 anyone to do any further research.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010004",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 264",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. Well, not necessarily all at once, but we certainly had\n2 resources and I certainly did not ask that more be done\n3 awaiting the answers from the prospective juror on voir dire.\n4 Q. And you could have told the Court at that point, correct?\n5 A. I certainly could have said to the Court that there is a\n6 Google search out there that reveals that there's a suspended\n7 lawyer by the name of Catherine Conrad.\n8 Q. And you didn't do that?\n9 A. I did not do that.\n10 Q. Now you appreciated, it sounds to me just from what you\n11 said, pretty instantly, that this is potentially significant\n12 information, correct?\n13 A. If it's the same person, it's very significant information.\n14 I certainly appreciated that.\n15 Q. No one -- you didn't require anyone to have to explain that\n16 to you, correct?\n17 A. No. I mean, we had a lot of Google-type information on a\n18 lot of jurors and, you know, it's a big metropolitan area.\n19 Some of that --\n20 Q. Ms. Brune, I asked you a very specific question.\n21 A. Can --\n22 Q. You did not require anybody else to explain to you the\n23 significance of that information. Is that true?\n24 A. If that's your question, the answer is no, I did not ask\n25 anyone to do any further research.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010004",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brune",
      "Catherine Conrad"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5721",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010004"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}