mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010014.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "274",
    "document_number": "A-5731",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 274\n1 Q. You could have, but you didn't, correct?\n2 A. That's correct.\n3 Q. Now, other defense counsel raised questions or concerns\n4 about various potential jurors, correct?\n5 A. Now, you know that there was a joint defense agreement and\n6 I'm not by my answers in any way intending to waive it, but\n7 there certainly was a discussion and I think all of the defense\n8 counsel spoke their minds about prospective jurors. We were\n9 making our challenges collectively, so we had to work it out.\n10 Q. And here in court during the process of voir dire with the\n11 judge, various defense counsel were raising issues and\n12 concerned, correct?\n13 A. That's right.\n14 Q. And some of those issues and concerns were not based on a\n15 hundred percent knowledge, correct?\n16 A. That's certainly so.\n17 Q. And some of it was just based on gut feelings about the way\n18 people were acting or looking, correct?\n19 A. That's right.\n20 Q. So it wasn't based on perfect knowledge, correct?\n21 A. Unfortunately, that's true of jury selection in general.\n22 It certainly was not based on perfect knowledge.\n23 Q. Now, you recall Mr. Aponte?\n24 A. I think so.\n25 Q. Well, do you recall that there was a juror who had criminal\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 274",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. You could have, but you didn't, correct?\n2 A. That's correct.\n3 Q. Now, other defense counsel raised questions or concerns\n4 about various potential jurors, correct?\n5 A. Now, you know that there was a joint defense agreement and\n6 I'm not by my answers in any way intending to waive it, but\n7 there certainly was a discussion and I think all of the defense\n8 counsel spoke their minds about prospective jurors. We were\n9 making our challenges collectively, so we had to work it out.\n10 Q. And here in court during the process of voir dire with the\n11 judge, various defense counsel were raising issues and\n12 concerned, correct?\n13 A. That's right.\n14 Q. And some of those issues and concerns were not based on a\n15 hundred percent knowledge, correct?\n16 A. That's certainly so.\n17 Q. And some of it was just based on gut feelings about the way\n18 people were acting or looking, correct?\n19 A. That's right.\n20 Q. So it wasn't based on perfect knowledge, correct?\n21 A. Unfortunately, that's true of jury selection in general.\n22 It certainly was not based on perfect knowledge.\n23 Q. Now, you recall Mr. Aponte?\n24 A. I think so.\n25 Q. Well, do you recall that there was a juror who had criminal",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brune",
      "Aponte"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5731",
      "C2GFDAU1",
      "274"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript, likely from a trial. The text is typed and there are no visible redactions or damage."
}