mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010055.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "315",
    "document_number": "A-5772",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2grdau2 Brune - redirect 315\n1 immigration judge, her father, correct?\n2 A. I certainly read that in the email that we produced.\n3 Q. That's what the email says, correct?\n4 A. That's what the email says.\n5 Q. Going to page 11, it has information from the New York\n6 State Office of Court Administration, correct?\n7 A. It does.\n8 Q. It references license status as a suspended attorney,\n9 correct?\n10 A. Yes, it does.\n11 Q. You have just testified on cross-examination that you\n12 didn't think you had anything to investigate about her,\n13 correct?\n14 A. That's right.\n15 Q. If you had seen this Westlaw report on May 12th, you would\n16 have thought you had something to investigate, correct?\n17 A. I didn't, but I have to say that I don't believe it would\n18 have changed what happened here. By that I mean that this\n19 thing to me, without having any particular expertise in these\n20 things, looks like it mushed two people with the same name\n21 together. I was convinced that she was the Bronxville\n22 stay-at-home wife and not the suspended lawyer.\n23 (Continued on next page)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010055",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2grdau2 Brune - redirect 315",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 immigration judge, her father, correct?\n2 A. I certainly read that in the email that we produced.\n3 Q. That's what the email says, correct?\n4 A. That's what the email says.\n5 Q. Going to page 11, it has information from the New York\n6 State Office of Court Administration, correct?\n7 A. It does.\n8 Q. It references license status as a suspended attorney,\n9 correct?\n10 A. Yes, it does.\n11 Q. You have just testified on cross-examination that you\n12 didn't think you had anything to investigate about her,\n13 correct?\n14 A. That's right.\n15 Q. If you had seen this Westlaw report on May 12th, you would\n16 have thought you had something to investigate, correct?\n17 A. I didn't, but I have to say that I don't believe it would\n18 have changed what happened here. By that I mean that this\n19 thing to me, without having any particular expertise in these\n20 things, looks like it mushed two people with the same name\n21 together. I was convinced that she was the Bronxville\n22 stay-at-home wife and not the suspended lawyer.\n23 (Continued on next page)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010055",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "New York State Office of Court Administration"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Bronxville"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "May 12th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5772",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010055"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}