mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010060.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "320",
    "document_number": "A-5777",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 320\n1 time that I took that approach. I don't think it changes the\n2 picture because I don't think the Westlaw report itself has the\n3 picture. But what I had in making this decision was I figured\n4 they'd Googled, I Googled. I figured they didn't think she was\n5 a suspended lawyer based on the Google search and the note to\n6 the Court. I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer. But I\n7 figured if they were going to raise the Google issue, I'd lay\n8 it out.\n9 THE COURT: Did you ever consider consulting with the\n10 government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in\n11 fact a suspended lawyer, given your testimony right now that it\n12 was your assumption that the government was also looking into\n13 jurors on the internet?\n14 THE WITNESS: I did not. I think that the government\n15 and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things, but\n16 I know --\n17 THE COURT: Why not? Why not? If you knew that -- if\n18 it was your assumption that they were expending the same kind\n19 of resources researching the matter as you were,\n20 THE WITNESS: I'm a little bit in a zone where I'm not\n21 describing my thought processes, because I didn't think about\n22 raising it with the government. But what I'm trying to say is\n23 I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the\n24 rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but\n25 they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010060",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 320",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 time that I took that approach. I don't think it changes the\n2 picture because I don't think the Westlaw report itself has the\n3 picture. But what I had in making this decision was I figured\n4 they'd Googled, I Googled. I figured they didn't think she was\n5 a suspended lawyer based on the Google search and the note to\n6 the Court. I didn't think it was the suspended lawyer. But I\n7 figured if they were going to raise the Google issue, I'd lay\n8 it out.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9 THE COURT: Did you ever consider consulting with the\n10 government about the wild possibility that Juror No. 1 was in\n11 fact a suspended lawyer, given your testimony right now that it\n12 was your assumption that the government was also looking into\n13 jurors on the internet?",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "14 THE WITNESS: I did not. I think that the government\n15 and I come to different conclusions sometimes about things, but\n16 I know --",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17 THE COURT: Why not? Why not? If you knew that -- if\n18 it was your assumption that they were expending the same kind\n19 of resources researching the matter as you were,",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20 THE WITNESS: I'm a little bit in a zone where I'm not\n21 describing my thought processes, because I didn't think about\n22 raising it with the government. But what I'm trying to say is\n23 I assumed that the government and its paralegals and all the\n24 rest Googled the jurors and I don't always agree with them, but\n25 they're pretty good investigators and they have access to more",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010060",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "Westlaw"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "C2GFDAU3",
      "A-5777",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010060"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content is a Q&A session between the court and a witness."
}