DOJ-OGR-00010082.json 3.6 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "342",
  4. "document_number": "A-5799",
  5. "date": null,
  6. "document_type": "Court Transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 342\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Were you involved in the drafting of the facts section of\n3 the brief?\n4 A. I edited that section, yes.\n5 Q. Now, by the way, did you have discussions with Susan Brune\n6 or anyone else at the firm about whether people at your firm\n7 were going to discuss with other defense counsel what Theresa\n8 Trzaskoma had talked to you about on May 12th?\n9 A. No.\n10 Q. Are you telling us that there was no discussion at all\n11 about whether you were going to inform your co-counsel about\n12 the facts that you had learned or Theresa Trzaskoma had learned\n13 during voir dire and during, on or about May 12?\n14 A. I don't recall any discussion about speaking with other\n15 defense counsel.\n16 Q. Did you discuss with anyone at your firm about whether you\n17 were going to reveal in the brief that you were going to submit\n18 to the Court the facts that your firm were aware of that you\n19 and Randy Kim talked about?\n20 A. Yes, Susan Brune and I had a discussion.\n21 Q. So you discussed about whether you should or should not\n22 include in the facts section of your brief the facts that you\n23 learned either during voir dire or on May 12 but prior to\n24 receipt of the juror letter, correct?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010082",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 342",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Were you involved in the drafting of the facts section of\n3 the brief?\n4 A. I edited that section, yes.\n5 Q. Now, by the way, did you have discussions with Susan Brune\n6 or anyone else at the firm about whether people at your firm\n7 were going to discuss with other defense counsel what Theresa\n8 Trzaskoma had talked to you about on May 12th?\n9 A. No.\n10 Q. Are you telling us that there was no discussion at all\n11 about whether you were going to inform your co-counsel about\n12 the facts that you had learned or Theresa Trzaskoma had learned\n13 during voir dire and during, on or about May 12?\n14 A. I don't recall any discussion about speaking with other\n15 defense counsel.\n16 Q. Did you discuss with anyone at your firm about whether you\n17 were going to reveal in the brief that you were going to submit\n18 to the Court the facts that your firm were aware of that you\n19 and Randy Kim talked about?\n20 A. Yes, Susan Brune and I had a discussion.\n21 Q. So you discussed about whether you should or should not\n22 include in the facts section of your brief the facts that you\n23 learned either during voir dire or on May 12 but prior to\n24 receipt of the juror letter, correct?\n25 A. Yes.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010082",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Susan Brune",
  36. "Theresa Trzaskoma",
  37. "Randy Kim",
  38. "Edelstein"
  39. ],
  40. "organizations": [
  41. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [],
  44. "dates": [
  45. "May 12"
  46. ],
  47. "reference_numbers": [
  48. "C2GFDAU3",
  49. "A-5799",
  50. "DOJ-OGR-00010082"
  51. ]
  52. },
  53. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  54. }