| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "8",
- "document_number": "A-5823",
- "date": null,
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366\n1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime\n5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the\n6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that\n7 correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any\n12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was\n13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,\n15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared\n16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing\n17 information during the course of the trial. But I have\n18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.\n22 (Witness excused)\n23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the\n24 same law firm.\n25 BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010106",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime\n5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the\n6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that\n7 correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any\n12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was\n13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,\n15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared\n16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing\n17 information during the course of the trial. But I have\n18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.\n22 (Witness excused)",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the\n24 same law firm.",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "25 BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010106",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Mr. Shechtman",
- "Mr. Schoeman",
- "Ms. Trzaskoma",
- "Mr. Okula",
- "Mr. Parse",
- "Barry Berke",
- "Barry H. Berke"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "May 13th"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "A-5823",
- "DOJ-OGR-00010106"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with some indication of a witness being excused and another attorney being called. The footer contains contact information for the court reporters and a reference number."
- }
|