mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010109.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "369",
    "document_number": "A-5826",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2rda4 Berke - direct 369\n1 copy machines and other things and often spent time back there,\n2 I remember talking to Ms. Brune about the note.\n3 I recall her saying that they had identified a person\n4 with the same name who had been a disbarred lawyer. I recall\n5 saying to her, well, that can't be, because she certainly isn't\n6 a lawyer. I said, I assume she was asked what her educational\n7 background was. I remember Ms. Brune said she did, she was\n8 asked, she said that she had a BA degree. Ms. Brune told me\n9 what it was in. I don't recall as I sit here. But it was some\n10 humanities. I recall saying, well, definitely it can't be the\n11 same person. She said, that's what I think as well.\n12 That was really the end of it. I would say the\n13 conversation probably did not last more than two, three minutes\n14 at most. Then I recall we left the room and that was it.\n15 Q. She said, that's what I think as well?\n16 A. That's what I recall.\n17 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.\n18 THE COURT: Cross-examination.\n19 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n20 BY MR. OKULA:\n21 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Berke.\n22 A. Good afternoon, Mr. Okula.\n23 Q. I get to check one of the things off my bucket list.\n24 A. I just hope you didn't prepare too much for it.\n25 Q. Would you agree with me, Mr. Berke, that if an attorney\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2rda4 Berke - direct 369",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 copy machines and other things and often spent time back there,\n2 I remember talking to Ms. Brune about the note.\n3 I recall her saying that they had identified a person\n4 with the same name who had been a disbarred lawyer. I recall\n5 saying to her, well, that can't be, because she certainly isn't\n6 a lawyer. I said, I assume she was asked what her educational\n7 background was. I remember Ms. Brune said she did, she was\n8 asked, she said that she had a BA degree. Ms. Brune told me\n9 what it was in. I don't recall as I sit here. But it was some\n10 humanities. I recall saying, well, definitely it can't be the\n11 same person. She said, that's what I think as well.\n12 That was really the end of it. I would say the\n13 conversation probably did not last more than two, three minutes\n14 at most. Then I recall we left the room and that was it.\n15 Q. She said, that's what I think as well?\n16 A. That's what I recall.\n17 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.\n18 THE COURT: Cross-examination.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "19 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n20 BY MR. OKULA:\n21 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Berke.\n22 A. Good afternoon, Mr. Okula.\n23 Q. I get to check one of the things off my bucket list.\n24 A. I just hope you didn't prepare too much for it.\n25 Q. Would you agree with me, Mr. Berke, that if an attorney",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Brune",
      "Mr. Berke",
      "Mr. Okula",
      "Mr. Shechtman"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5826",
      "C2rda4",
      "369",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript, likely from a legal proceeding. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content includes a direct examination and cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Berke."
}