DOJ-OGR-00010106.json 3.6 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "8",
  4. "document_number": "A-5823",
  5. "date": null,
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366\n1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime\n5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the\n6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that\n7 correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any\n12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was\n13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,\n15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared\n16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing\n17 information during the course of the trial. But I have\n18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.\n22 (Witness excused)\n23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the\n24 same law firm.\n25 BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010106",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime\n5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the\n6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that\n7 correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any\n12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was\n13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,\n15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared\n16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing\n17 information during the course of the trial. But I have\n18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.\n22 (Witness excused)",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the\n24 same law firm.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "25 BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010106",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Mr. Shechtman",
  41. "Mr. Schoeman",
  42. "Ms. Trzaskoma",
  43. "Mr. Okula",
  44. "Mr. Parse",
  45. "Barry Berke",
  46. "Barry H. Berke"
  47. ],
  48. "organizations": [
  49. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  50. ],
  51. "locations": [],
  52. "dates": [
  53. "May 13th"
  54. ],
  55. "reference_numbers": [
  56. "A-5823",
  57. "DOJ-OGR-00010106"
  58. ]
  59. },
  60. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with some indication of a witness being excused and another attorney being called. The footer contains contact information for the court reporters and a reference number."
  61. }